todd Posted October 24, 2004 Author Posted October 24, 2004 I'd like to gauge the IQ of the poller 83264[/snapback] Brilliant! I've been had! Questions, mr. mensa, will drew fix the 0 rushing TDs that we have? Just wondering.
todd Posted October 24, 2004 Author Posted October 24, 2004 I agree, it's not about fixing a 1-5 team, it's about moving forward with the understanding that we have a washed up QB and it's a chance to rebuild for the future, that's why you traded you no.1 83238[/snapback] Now THAT'S the answer that I was looking for. When Drew gets benched, and he should, I hope when Losman stinks it up people don't start bitching to put drew back in. But I've been here long enough to know that people will. It's the problem with the football IQ, ya know?
njsue Posted October 24, 2004 Posted October 24, 2004 Take a beating. Losman will get killed behind this line.
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted October 24, 2004 Posted October 24, 2004 I'd like to gauge the IQ of the poller 83264[/snapback] ding ding ding.....we haff a winnah! DREW BLEDSOE SUX0R!!!!!!!!!! Way to go Deion Sanders, waltzin into the end zone......LOL Way to go Statue with the drug-induced play action passing. You're about as fast as that dude in GTA when he runs into the on-screen "pill". Another day of hilarity from Drew Bledsoe......another day to take in the results of the worst trade in Buffalo sports history.
AJ1 Posted October 24, 2004 Posted October 24, 2004 Brilliant! I've been had! Questions, mr. mensa, will drew fix the 0 rushing TDs that we have? Just wondering. 83275[/snapback] Only stated that because I believe I've disagreed with every opinion you've had on the board. Where I've been right about 2/3 rds of the time, your batting average is lower.
jarthur31 Posted October 24, 2004 Posted October 24, 2004 Now THAT'S the answer that I was looking for. When Drew gets benched, and he should, I hope when Losman stinks it up people don't start bitching to put drew back in. But I've been here long enough to know that people will. It's the problem with the football IQ, ya know? 83281[/snapback] LMAO, so true! I've seen that too here from alot of folks. I have no clue how a change at QB somehow improves catching the ball. JP or Shane won't always hit the receivers between the numbers but you can bet the haters won't bring that up either.
todd Posted October 24, 2004 Author Posted October 24, 2004 Only stated that because I believe I've disagreed with every opinion you've had on the board. Where I've been right about 2/3 rds of the time, your batting average is lower. 83288[/snapback] Oh really? Back it up. Go ahead. I want examples. If you're going to be an ass and call me out, you better damn well back it up. So do it.
YOOOOOO Posted October 24, 2004 Posted October 24, 2004 LMAO, so true! I've seen that too here from alot of folks. I have no clue how a change at QB somehow improves catching the ball. JP or Shane won't always hit the receivers between the numbers but you can bet the haters won't bring that up either. 83292[/snapback] Were 1-5....why not start to move towards the future?? Again Bledsoe is not the only person to fault in our offense....but were 1-5...time for Losman(when healthy) to get some experience(this season)....
JAMIEBUF12 Posted October 24, 2004 Posted October 24, 2004 when you have a qb that throws 3 straight int's then yes he should be held accountable.drew is done and even shane matthews could hand off to the rb's and play a low risk style of ball
Recommended Posts