stuckincincy Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 The OH Dem Secretary of State, among other things, is required to insure the execution of a fair election process. Jennifer Brunner got slapped by the OH Supreme Court - unanimously - for her attempt to invalidate GOP absentee ballots. Of course, with her tail shoved between her whatever, she praised the process... http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2008100...070333/1004/COL and here is the court decision: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf...8-ohio-5097.pdf But feel free to deny, Dems. Your party is now controlled by hard leftists, socialists bent on rule by cadre, the self-important, intolerant, disputatious crowd. And like good sheep, you will follow them to the eventual removal of all individual rights and be subservient to the State. I wouldn't be at all surprised if in 30 years, your paycheck goes to the Federal government, and they will mete out money to you as they feel necessary according to their view - for your benefit, of course. You saps can't smell the coffee, and in the rare instance that you do...you demand that the State protect you from the dangers of coffee. Speaking of, I went to my local McD's for my morning coffee. The menu placards changed - the food pictorials on clamshells were replaced by the same food pictorial...but on plates. The shift manager got my coffee. I mentioned it to her. She rolled her eyes, put her palms out, shrugged her shoulders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 disputatious Is that even a fecking word? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 But feel free to deny, Dems. Your party is now controlled by hard leftists, socialists bent on rule by cadre, the self-important, intolerant, disputatious crowd. A Deny it??? We are celebrating it! Can't wait for the Reichstag fire so we can institute the dictatorship! Be afraid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Is that even a fecking word? One of the finer points to Cincy's "A" game is that he keeps me heading to the dictionary! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Your (the democratic) party is now controlled by hard leftists, socialists bent on rule by cadre, the self-important, intolerant, disputatious crowd. That is one of the most absurd assertions I've seen in a while. You haven't provided one bit of evidence to support that claim, nor do I think you would be able to. I mean I guess the first thing we'd have to establish is who it is (if anyone) that actually controls the party. I like to think parties are not controlled by any one person, but maybe I'm wrong on that (Dick Cheney??). Then once we have a list of names we could discuss the character of these folks to see if they even come close to your labels. Right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 This is difficult to keep track of. We have Dallas Cowboys voting in Nevada...fraud in CT, IN, MI, OH, ILL..ummm where else among the 57 states? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 The OH Dem Secretary of State, among other things, is required to insure the execution of a fair election process. Jennifer Brunner got slapped by the OH Supreme Court - unanimously - for her attempt to invalidate GOP absentee ballots. Of course, with her tail shoved between her whatever, she praised the process... http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2008100...070333/1004/COL and here is the court decision: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf...8-ohio-5097.pdf But feel free to deny, Dems. Your party is now controlled by hard leftists, socialists bent on rule by cadre, the self-important, intolerant, disputatious crowd. And like good sheep, you will follow them to the eventual removal of all individual rights and be subservient to the State. I wouldn't be at all surprised if in 30 years, your paycheck goes to the Federal government, and they will mete out money to you as they feel necessary according to their view - for your benefit, of course. You saps can't smell the coffee, and in the rare instance that you do...you demand that the State protect you from the dangers of coffee. Speaking of, I went to my local McD's for my morning coffee. The menu placards changed - the food pictorials on clamshells were replaced by the same food pictorial...but on plates. The shift manager got my coffee. I mentioned it to her. She rolled her eyes, put her palms out, shrugged her shoulders. And we are also hearing of attempts to remove dem registered voters from rolls in battleground states like VA, NC etc. We need a simple freaking national registration process for folks, you register as a damn citizin and ya get an ID card and along with that if qualified the right to vote. When ya go to the polling place your card is read and the fact you voted is registered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 I see the usual parade of posts deflecting, ignoring and ridiculing the initial story but not one of you saw fit to comment on the proceedings in Ohio? This isn't ACORN or some other fringe group of nut-jobs where we expect this sort of thing, this is a corrupt Secretary of State directly influencing an election (cue the Katherine Harris references). Then again, I guess you all just proved Cincy's point -- that the Dems are now controlled by such nut-jobs that you are all happen to indulge as long as they lie, cheat and steal for your candidate. Pretty ironic considering some of you were no doubt among the whiners in 2004 over Ohio's so called voting 'irregularities'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 And we are also hearing of attempts to remove dem registered voters from rolls in battleground states like VA, NC etc. "You are hearing"? WTF does that mean? Have you "heard" from any other state SUPREME COURTS with rebukes to Secretaries of State? Did you even read the links? Way to excuse outright vote fraud from the state's highest ranking official in charge of the process by attempting to compare it to unsubstantiated rumor. Fuggin' 'tard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elegantelliotoffen Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Pretty ironic considering some of you were no doubt among the whiners in 2004 over Ohio's so called voting 'irregularities'. I love how it takes the righties to be on the verge of a humiliating landslide loss for them to become converts to what everyone else has known for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 This is difficult to keep track of. We have Dallas Cowboys voting in Nevada...fraud in CT, IN, MI, OH, ILL..ummm where else among the 57 states? How about Texas. I see dead people http://www.click2houston.com/investigates/...375/detail.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 The OH Dem Secretary of State, among other things, is required to insure the execution of a fair election process. Jennifer Brunner got slapped by the OH Supreme Court - unanimously - for her attempt to invalidate GOP absentee ballots. Of course, with her tail shoved between her whatever, she praised the process... http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2008100...070333/1004/COL and here is the court decision: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf...8-ohio-5097.pdf But feel free to deny, Dems. Your party is now controlled by hard leftists, socialists bent on rule by cadre, the self-important, intolerant, disputatious crowd. And like good sheep, you will follow them to the eventual removal of all individual rights and be subservient to the State. I wouldn't be at all surprised if in 30 years, your paycheck goes to the Federal government, and they will mete out money to you as they feel necessary according to their view - for your benefit, of course. You saps can't smell the coffee, and in the rare instance that you do...you demand that the State protect you from the dangers of coffee. Speaking of, I went to my local McD's for my morning coffee. The menu placards changed - the food pictorials on clamshells were replaced by the same food pictorial...but on plates. The shift manager got my coffee. I mentioned it to her. She rolled her eyes, put her palms out, shrugged her shoulders. Thanks for the update Hannity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in CA Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 http://www.democracynow.org/ Democracy Now had a report on voter fraud and even had Brunner on for a ten minute interview. I haven't gotten to that interview yet, but the entire piece seems pretty relevant to this discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SD Jarhead Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 And we are also hearing of attempts to remove dem registered voters from rolls in battleground states like VA, NC etc. We need a simple freaking national registration process for folks, you register as a damn citizin and ya get an ID card and along with that if qualified the right to vote. When ya go to the polling place your card is read and the fact you voted is registered. Who do you think is blocking the requirement to produce ID when voting? Hint: It's not the Repig's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Who do you think is blocking the requirement to produce ID when voting? Hint: It's not the Repig's... Whenever someone is asked for a voter ID in Maryland - the screams of "voter intimidation" are deafening... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 I see the usual parade of posts deflecting, ignoring and ridiculing the initial story but not one of you saw fit to comment on the proceedings in Ohio? This isn't ACORN or some other fringe group of nut-jobs where we expect this sort of thing, this is a corrupt Secretary of State directly influencing an election (cue the Katherine Harris references). Then again, I guess you all just proved Cincy's point -- that the Dems are now controlled by such nut-jobs that you are all happen to indulge as long as they lie, cheat and steal for your candidate. Pretty ironic considering some of you were no doubt among the whiners in 2004 over Ohio's so called voting 'irregularities'. IMO, this is despicable behavior by the OH Sec of State and there is no excuse for her actions. Am I interpreting your reference to the so called voting 'irregularities' implying that they were nonsense and didn't occur? A precinct in an evangelical church in Miami County didn't report a 98% turnout, while a Cleveland inner city precinct turned out 7%, tens of thousands of registered democrats weren't purged from the rolls, voting machines were not misallocated, etc. etc. etc. None of that happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Am I interpreting your reference to the so called voting 'irregularities' implying that they were nonsense and didn't occur? A precinct in an evangelical church in Miami County didn't report a 98% turnout, while a Cleveland inner city precinct turned out 7%, tens of thousands of registered democrats weren't purged from the rolls, voting machines were not misallocated, etc. etc. etc. None of that happened? No, I wasn't implying that at all. I don't recall all the specifics about Ohio in '04, although I do recall that a lot of it was either overblown or sounded like local shenanigans that both parties routinely pull. I certainly don't condone or excuse any of it from either side and find it appalling that both parties routinely engage in all sort of unethical and illegal behavior around the elections. If I was in charge, people caught doing such things (ACORN being the latest example) would find themselves with very long prison terms. But I sure do think there is a notable difference when it is the Secretary of State designing and directing the fraud. But is she going to jail? Losing her job? Punished in any way? No. Big surprise that it will continue to happen over and over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 The OH Dem Secretary of State, among other things, is required to insure the execution of a fair election process. Jennifer Brunner got slapped by the OH Supreme Court - unanimously - for her attempt to invalidate GOP absentee ballots. Of course, with her tail shoved between her whatever, she praised the process... http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2008100...070333/1004/COL and here is the court decision: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf...8-ohio-5097.pdf But feel free to deny, Dems. Your party is now controlled by hard leftists, socialists bent on rule by cadre, the self-important, intolerant, disputatious crowd. And like good sheep, you will follow them to the eventual removal of all individual rights and be subservient to the State. I wouldn't be at all surprised if in 30 years, your paycheck goes to the Federal government, and they will mete out money to you as they feel necessary according to their view - for your benefit, of course. You saps can't smell the coffee, and in the rare instance that you do...you demand that the State protect you from the dangers of coffee. Speaking of, I went to my local McD's for my morning coffee. The menu placards changed - the food pictorials on clamshells were replaced by the same food pictorial...but on plates. The shift manager got my coffee. I mentioned it to her. She rolled her eyes, put her palms out, shrugged her shoulders. Thank you. We learned from the best. How do you like being on the receiving end for once? PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Thank you. We learned from the best. How do you like being on the receiving end for once? PTR For once? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 No, I wasn't implying that at all. I don't recall all the specifics about Ohio in '04, although I do recall that a lot of it with either overblown or sounded like local shenanigans that both parties routinely pull. I certainly don't condone or excuse any of it from either side and find it appalling that both parties routinely engage in all sort of unethical and illegal behavior around the elections. If I was in charge, people caught doing such things (ACORN being the latest example) would find themselves with very long prison terms. But I sure do think there is a notable difference when it is the Secretary of State designing and directing the fraud. But is she going to jail? Losing her job? Punished in any way? No. Big surprise that it will continue to happen over and over again. ok, I wasn't sure, hence my question. It's hard to tell which election cycle in Ohio is worse: this year or 2004, based on the allegations, but in both cases, the Secretary of State appears to be the main culprit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts