yall Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Man why can't we have gun rights AND abortion choices. I don't get why it's one or the other. Yeah - some of us want to perform abortions with guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 And this??? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/2/851...0062/867/545256 You will never see a response. I asked about Palin and her husbands support for the Alaska Independence Party and about her Reverends shady background. Nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Also this??? http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archiv...mccain_asso.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 9, 2008 Author Share Posted October 9, 2008 Would you or would you not agree that given the 3rd party verification for some of the claims, that this is something that should have been investigated/known many, many moons ago? Don't you think items like this are just a tad more relevant than Sarah Palin's daughter or if Joe Biden exaggerates his Pakistan trips? I think that each of them should be looked into for a small part of one day, shown that it was nonsense, and then totally forgotten as having zero significance to candidate or race or world or future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 This is all called rat fing to quote "Jeb Magruder" of Watergate fame, but it is all distortions with maybe a drop of truth and if not I wouldn't trust the veracity of anything coming out of either side right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 I think that each of them should be looked into for a small part of one day, shown that it was nonsense, and then totally forgotten as having zero significance to candidate or race or world or future. But why is it nonsense? The implication here is that nothing a person has done in the past has any bearing on their candidacy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elegantelliotoffen Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 But why is it nonsense? The implication here is that nothing a person has done in the past has any bearing on their candidacy? It's nonsense because you can't take anything a person who believes that Michelle Obama "hates America" and is "psycho" seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 But why is it nonsense? The implication here is that nothing a person has done in the past has any bearing on their candidacy? Sure it does, just that the trust worthiness of the sources at this late date in time in the campaign when one side is desperate and the other side is counter punching with equal venom is to be taken with a grain of salt and not to be believed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 And yet, you people will still vote for these guys... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 But why is it nonsense? The implication here is that nothing a person has done in the past has any bearing on their candidacy? If you really want to believe this, I have great piece of property for sale in Pelham, MA for $500,000... it is worth it even in today's current market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 But why is it nonsense? The implication here is that nothing a person has done in the past has any bearing on their candidacy? And that goes for Palin right? Nothing in her past that has any bearing on being the VP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 And that goes for Palin right? Nothing in her past that has any bearing on being the VP? Forget Palin, what about that lying sack of She#@, McBush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 9, 2008 Author Share Posted October 9, 2008 But why is it nonsense? The implication here is that nothing a person has done in the past has any bearing on their candidacy? No, the implication here is that there is zero evidence that Barack Obama is anything but a member of the Democratic Party, has been every day of his adult life and political career, and is just as American and patriotic as Scott Sarama. Maybe moreso because I have never seen him say anything ever about hating Americans. Just the opposite, in fact. If you, yourself, want to spend the time looking for Boogeymen, please waste your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Forget Palin, what about that lying sack of She#@, McBush. True. But if we're playing the guilt by association game... well, then that glass house better watch out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 True. But if we're playing the guilt by association game... well, then that glass house better watch out. I know, Abramoff has not even been brought up yet.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 hahahhaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Yep, two can play this game: Why did McCain these two clowns endorsement???? http://www.mnblue.com/node/1316l Please, there is a lots of the crap out their. Do you want more? You're missing the point armadildo dude. This isn't a gotchya moment about McCain. We all know that McCain is Lieing scum sucking sumbitch. The vetting on Barry has been pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Extremist .... extremely extremist. Would you classify Obama as an extemist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 No, the implication here is that there is zero evidence that Barack Obama is anything but a member of the Democratic Party, has been every day of his adult life and political career, and is just as American and patriotic as Scott Sarama. Maybe moreso because I have never seen him say anything ever about hating Americans. Just the opposite, in fact. If you, yourself, want to spend the time looking for Boogeymen, please waste your time. You mean other than the "Air-raiding and killing civilians" bit? How VERY patriotic. Edit: Again, not liek McCain's any better. This country's going to hell. The revolution can't come soon enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 You mean other than the "Air-raiding and killing civilians" bit? How VERY patriotic. Edit: Again, not liek McCain's any better. This country's going to hell. The revolution can't come soon enough. sad you even brought that obama quote up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.529869a0a9afd197241cad0932282c97.jpg)
Recommended Posts