DrFishfinder Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 Oye, Chico. Chupa la mi pinga. usted también, su pinga es pequeño.
Justice Posted October 7, 2008 Author Posted October 7, 2008 usted también, su pinga es pequeño. Tu mujera gusta la mi pinga mucho
DrFishfinder Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 Tu mujera gusta la mi pinga mucho Usted tiene gusto de su propia pinga mucho.
Lori Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 Why doesn't anyone make the Fish pay for using that play by pummeling Chad Pennington? When CP lines up at receiver he is fair game to get hit within the first five yards of the LOS, isn't he? What? How DARE you suggest that defenses should intentionally attempt to injure Pennington? You bastage. (For the record, that's not my opinion -- that's a PG-13 version of a few of of the responses Tim Graham received when he mentioned the same idea on his blog after the Pats* game: Wildcat weakness: Destroy the vulnerable QB)
Justice Posted October 7, 2008 Author Posted October 7, 2008 Usted tiene gusto de su propia pinga mucho. Yeah well, you do the same, but only you're thinking about Rico Sueva when you're doing it!
The Dean Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 What? How DARE you suggest that defenses should intentionally attempt to injure Pennington? You bastage. (For the record, that's not my opinion -- that's a PG-13 version of a few of of the responses Tim Graham received when he mentioned the same idea on his blog after the Pats* game: Wildcat weakness: Destroy the vulnerable QB) I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't support any intentional attempt to injure another player. Smack him around, and remind him that he is out of position? Absolutely.
Recommended Posts