The Senator Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 You can always tell a Yale man... ...but you can't tell him much. GO BILLSSS!!!! 19 and 0 baby!!!!!
scribo Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 I wholeheartedly agree that everyone needs to recognize there is only ONE New York NFL team, but this article is very positive toward our beloved Bills.
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 You can always tell a Yale man... Would it be because of the bulletproof vest? Or was that UPenn? I can't remember...
The Senator Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 Would it be because of the bulletproof vest? Or was that UPenn? I can't remember... Actually, you may be thinking of my alma mater.... The Day Cornell Died
MattyT Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 From the article... Kick me in the face. Hard. Happy to oblige.
Campy Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 I wholeheartedly agree that everyone needs to recognize there is only ONE New York NFL team, but this article is very positive toward our beloved Bills. I'd say it's much more favorable of the need for a salary cap in baseball than it is of the Bills. In fact, other than stating that the Bills will finish ahead of the Pats* because of free agency and the Bretts because of the Madden Curse, and pointing out that Dallas currently has more losses than Bflo, it doesn't really say much about the Bills at all. "As long as a salary cap means teams like the Bills can someday top the Patriots and the standings, it will be good for baseball" is nearly insulting to Bflo...
scribo Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 It isn't insulting to the Bills. We all know the WNY market is smaller than Boston, Dallas, etc. It also says we're going to win the division. It says the Bills are a shining example of what's right with the salary camp.
TheLynchTrain Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 Yeah but everyone knows (at least Bills fans, and those on this board) that the salary cap is unequal. Everyone knows that it will only get worse for small market teams (85 mil to 122 mil in 5 years). His whole part about teams not being able to keep their players b/c of the cap is crap - the free agent pool has sucked the past few years because big market teams re-upped their free agents. The few good free agents on the market were those that played for small market teams who wouldn't get in a bidding war. For a kid attending Yale, he's not too bright.
Recommended Posts