Got_Wood Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Is it possible that the Raiders are acting like a miserable organization in order to gain an edge each week? I know it sounds out there, but if the opposing team takes the Raiders for granted each week then it gives them an advantage come game time. Each week, there are reports that Kiffin will be fired and the organization is in total disarray. Is this what Davis wants? Maybe I'm giving them too much credit. But it appears that Lane is starting to turn that team in the right direction.
The Big Cat Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Is it possible that the Raiders are acting like a miserable organization in order to gain an edge each week? I know it sounds out there, but if the opposing team takes the Raiders for granted each week then it gives them an advantage come game time. Each week, there are reports that Kiffin will be fired and the organization is in total disarray. Is this what Davis wants? Maybe I'm giving them too much credit. But it appears that Lane is starting to turn that team in the right direction. Well, said theory has failed twice as often as it has succeed so far this year.
ProjectPat Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 The Raiders are just a bunch of idiots. Thats all there is to it. Jamarcus will turn out to be a bust soon. McFadden does look like he could be a good one though.
Cugalabanza Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Is it possible that the Raiders are acting...? Nope.
Steely Dan Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Is it possible that the Raiders are acting like a miserable organization in order to gain an edge each week? I know it sounds out there, but if the opposing team takes the Raiders for granted each week then it gives them an advantage come game time. Each week, there are reports that Kiffin will be fired and the organization is in total disarray. Is this what Davis wants? Maybe I'm giving them too much credit. But it appears that Lane is starting to turn that team in the right direction. Nope. What he said.
Wacka Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 The letters in the sports section today ( I'm local to the Oakland area) all say that Davis should step down as GM or sell the team.
MarkyMannn Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Is it possible that the Raiders are acting like a miserable organization in order to gain an edge each week? Yeah that strategy worked real well for us the last 7-8 years
H2o Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Russell will be a good QB, McFadden will be a good RB, and Al Davis will die soon enough. Through pain and suffering a woman gives berth to a child. In the same right, a winning franchise is built. Unless you're the Bengals.
Alphadawg7 Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Russell will be a good QB, McFadden will be a good RB, and Al Davis will die soon enough. Through pain and suffering a woman gives berth to a child. In the same right, a winning franchise is built. Unless you're the Bengals. Michael Bush is the best player on that team...
BuffaloBill Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Russell will be a good QB, McFadden will be a good RB, and Al Davis will die soon enough. Through pain and suffering a woman gives berth to a child. In the same right, a winning franchise is built. Unless you're the Bengals. Too much child berth makes the process even more painful.
DanInUticaTampa Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Michael Bush is the best player on that team... Mccfadden is probably the better of the two, just less experienced. Yeah that strategy worked real well for us the last 7-8 years woot! go us!
Tcali Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Is it possible that the Raiders are acting like a miserable organization in order to gain an edge each week? I know it sounds out there, but if the opposing team takes the Raiders for granted each week then it gives them an advantage come game time. Each week, there are reports that Kiffin will be fired and the organization is in total disarray. Is this what Davis wants? Maybe I'm giving them too much credit. But it appears that Lane is starting to turn that team in the right direction. I think the Raiders are loaded with talent and that Kiffin is a good young coach. Their biggest mistake would be to get rid of him. That would be Gruden2.
H2o Posted September 26, 2008 Posted September 26, 2008 Michael Bush is the best player on that team... There, I fixed it for you
generaLee83 Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Russell will be a good QB, McFadden will be a good RB, and Al Davis will die soon enough. Through pain and suffering a woman gives berth to a child. In the same right, a winning franchise is built. Unless you're the Bengals. Al Davis' head looks like a huge vagina.
The Dean Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Al Davis will die soon enough. Well, for Raider fans, he couldn't possibly die soon enough.
JStranger76 Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Exactly. Lane is a good young coach being crippled by Al Davis. I'm not gonna say Davis needs to roll over and die, but being sent to an institution the rest of his life would work just fine.
BuffaloBlood Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 The Raiders are not bright enough to be acting...... they are a disgrace to the NFL and should be moved to LA...... and then back to Oakland........ then back to LA....... the Oakland........ then LA....... you get my point
Captain Hindsight Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 I think the Raiders are loaded with talent and that Kiffin is a good young coach. Their biggest mistake would be to get rid of him. That would be Gruden2. not to mention Shannahan
lets_go_bills Posted September 27, 2008 Posted September 27, 2008 The Raiders have only one problem. But it's a big one. One they can't solve. Their problem is Al Davis. He is a moron and is clearly insane. He's gotta go.
Recommended Posts