bills-fan in arizona Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Not sure if this has been posted, but I can't figure out why the Raiiders didn't go for 2 after Higgens long TD. To me that was a worse decision then not calling timeouts. PS I'm not complaining - just curious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Not sure if this has been posted, but I can't figure out why the Raiiders didn't go for 2 after Higgens long TD. To me that was a worse decision then not calling timeouts. PS I'm not complaining - just curious Their defense was man-handling us all day. We had just come off a drive where we went down the field and scored, I don't think the Raiders thought we would be able to do the same thing again, and then again to get a field goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Because going for two would've been a horrible decision. If the Raiders would've missed the two pt conversion than they would've only had a 8pt lead over the Bills. Meaning that the Bills could tie the game with a TD and 2pt conversion of their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Fong Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Because going for two would've been a horrible decision. If the Raiders would've missed the two pt conversion than they would've only had a 8pt lead over the Bills. Meaning that the Bills could tie the game with a TD and 2pt conversion of their own. Yeah I think people really over think the 2 pt. conversion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts