fbzh2 Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 Holy Crap!!! I thought Mitchell was gonna punch his girly face in.... Schoebl's standing there saying.. I don't have it any more. Mitchells telling him to shut up and he responds. I'm just sayin', I'm trying to deal with it myself, the whole time Mitchell's telling him to shut up. WOW! There's a guy you want to go to war with My opinion of Schoebel was changed by that one video clip. If thats the approach he takes to the game. I don't want him out there. Cripes!!! WOW, that does not sound good at all.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellDressed Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I think he needs a change of shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantankerous Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 You can't tell the context of his remarks. Maybe...just maybe he's joking around? Maybe, being teammates, they get along well enough to be able to do that from time to time? Ridiculous thought, I know. Edit... And if you watch the games you'd notice him...he's been playing quite well despite the lack of meaningless "kudos" from Don Criqui and Dan Fouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Holy Crap!!! I thought Mitchell was gonna punch his girly face in.... Schoebl's standing there saying.. I don't have it any more. Mitchells telling him to shut up and he responds. I'm just sayin', I'm trying to deal with it myself, the whole time Mitchell's telling him to shut up. WOW! There's a guy you want to go to war with My opinion of Schoebel was changed by that one video clip. If thats the approach he takes to the game. I don't want him out there. Cripes!!! LOL!!! Yep, he's wired for sound, he knows he's wired for sound, and he also knows that how he acts and whatever he says is gonna be seen and heard by all the LOT's in the league... Think People! THINK!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 It was. Kelsay had a pretty good game yesterday. I'd love to see that if anyone finds a link. They showed the same segment on Inside the NFL after week one, also. Pretty good stuff! I will look for a link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 You can't tell the context of his remarks. Maybe...just maybe he's joking around? Maybe, being teammates, they get along well enough to be able to do that from time to time? Ridiculous thought, I know. I saw the segment, and I think you are on to something! I think Schobel was channeling his "inner Favre" (Madden says we all have one) and playing down how solid a game he was having...funny, I clicked on this thread, after distinctly thinking the last two weeks, how much better our DE's look with Stroud in the middle. They got handled a little by the Raiders yesterday, but still came up with some good plays... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 My opinion of Schoebel was changed by that one video clip. :w00t: God forbid your opinion is affected by how he actually plays! But hey, he didn't do anything yesterday. Right? Of course beating his man in .23 seconds and forcing the QB to chuck it away doesn't appear on the stat sheet and isn't mentioned by announcers. Which means none of you gurus saw it, it doesn't count and Schobel sucks. Thanks and credit to Jack for the pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills44 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 :w00t: God forbid your opinion is affected by how he actually plays! But hey, he didn't do anything yesterday. Right? Of course beating his man in .23 seconds and forcing the QB to chuck it away doesn't appear on the stat sheet and isn't mentioned by announcers. Which means none of you gurus saw it, it doesn't count and Schobel sucks. Thanks and credit to Jack for the pic. .23 seconds? That's one hell of a burst. That one play (and bad link) aside, what did he do the rest of the game (against a backup LT)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 .23 seconds? That's one hell of a burst. That one play (and bad link) aside, what did he do the rest of the game (against a backup LT)? Completely stoned a Raiders running game that went berserk off-tackle last week? Applied some back-side pressure in a defensive scheme that brought little to no extra pressure from its 'backers and DBs? Protected Ellison from being devoured by the Raiders ground attack? Effectively dropped into coverage on several occasions? Helped hold the Raiders offense under a pathetic 250 yards? Yeah he did all those things, just like he always does. But I didn't see him get any sacks so he must not have done anything. And what's the problem with the link? Works fine for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills44 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Completely stoned a Raiders running game that went berserk off-tackle last week?Applied some back-side pressure in a defensive scheme that brought little to no extra pressure from its 'backers and DBs? Protected Ellison from being devoured by the Raiders ground attack? Effectively dropped into coverage on several occasions? Helped hold the Raiders offense under a pathetic 250 yards? Yeah he did all those things, just like he always does. But I didn't see him get any sacks so he must not have done anything. And what's the problem with the link? Works fine for me. You're right. He was a terror and a disruptive force yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 You're right. He was a terror and a disruptive force yesterday. No, you're right. He sucks so bad that the Raiders rushed for under 100 yards while their QB completed a total of 9 passes. Maybe next week he'll notch a sack and the announcers will mention his name. With any luck your eagle eyes will notice him then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills44 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 No, you're right. He sucks so bad that the Raiders rushed for under 100 yards while their QB completed a total of 9 passes.Maybe next week he'll notch a sack and the announcers will mention his name. With any luck your eagle eyes will notice him then. My "eagle eyes" will be busy trying to detect his Usain Bolt-like speed. .23 seconds .... Put words into my mouth, if it helps your argument, but I never said that Schobel "sucks". I just don't happen to have as high an opinion of his play as some here apparently do. I do find it funny seeing you trot out stats (total yards allowed, rushing yards allowed, completions allowed), while at the same time, apparently dismissing sacks. Never mind the fact that the Raiders offense sucks.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Completely stoned a Raiders running game that went berserk off-tackle last week?Applied some back-side pressure in a defensive scheme that brought little to no extra pressure from its 'backers and DBs? Protected Ellison from being devoured by the Raiders ground attack? Effectively dropped into coverage on several occasions? Helped hold the Raiders offense under a pathetic 250 yards? Yeah he did all those things, just like he always does. But I didn't see him get any sacks so he must not have done anything. And what's the problem with the link? Works fine for me. The link gave me the following error message when I tried to use it: > You don't have permission to access /servlet/Images/501532007/photos3794/2/1/55/73/94/6/694735501211_0_BG.jpg on this server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 .23 seconds .... Considering that the guy trying to block him is already flopping around on the ground before Russell has even hit his drop, how long do you think it took before the Tackle was actually beat? .39 seconds? Put words into my mouth, if it helps your argument Yeah, the nerve of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills44 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Considering that the guy trying to block him is already flopping around on the ground before Russell has even hit his drop, how long do you think it took before the Tackle was actually beat?.39 seconds? Yeah, the nerve of me. My "eagle eyes" aren't trained to estimate the speed of objects moving at that rate. .23, .39....whatever makes you happy. I really don't care. Again, where did I say that Schobel "sucks"? Are you going to post a link to this thread (again)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 My "eagle eyes" aren't trained to estimate the speed of objects moving at that rate. .23, .39....whatever makes you happy. I really don't care. Again, where did I say that Schobel "sucks"? Are you going to post a link to this thread (again)? And where did I say he "was a terror and a disruptive force"? Which is precisely the post I linked to after you ironically accused me of putting words in your mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 The link gave me the following error message when I tried to use it: > You don't have permission to access /servlet/Images/501532007/photos3794/2/1/55/73/94/6/694735501211_0_BG.jpg on this server. I linked to the following: http://images.kodakgallery.com/servlet/Ima...501211_0_BG.jpg And it's working fine for me in both Mozilla and IE. Perhaps your browser is truculent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I linked to the following:http://images.kodakgallery.com/servlet/Ima...501211_0_BG.jpg And it's working fine for me in both Mozilla and IE. Perhaps your browser is truculent? Does that site need a login? Because I'm getting the same: ForbiddenYou don't have permission to access /servlet/Images/501532007/photos3794/2/1/55/73/94/6/694735501211_0_BG.jpg on this server. Apache/1.3.39 Server at upsa-im107.ofoto.com Port 80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills44 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 And where did I say he "was a terror and a disruptive force"?Which is precisely the post I linked to after you ironically accused me of putting words in your mouth. Not exactly. Your link went to the first post in this thread. You posted a laundry list of Schobel's "accomplishments" yesterday. My "terror" comment was in response to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Doug Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Regardless of what his performance is this year, he is 31 years-old. He likely has already peaked and it will be down hill from here. Note to FO: start finding his replacement now, as he likely only has a couple of years left until he is just an old, average player who is making a ton of money (read: salary cap liability). Sorry for being so glass-is-half-full. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts