GG Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 To anyone who watched the second half of the Titans-Texans game, Eric King was outstanding replacing Harper, deflecting a sure TD and making two tackles for loss. But then, one would have to understand football to notice that... I thought only stat parroting morons would introduce that line of reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I'm sorry, I thought this thread was supposed to be about New England quarterbacks? Let's keep it that way. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I'm sorry, I thought this thread was supposed to be about New England quarterbacks? Let's keep it that way. Thanks. Killjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ish Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 And people say that pot doesn't make you a better athlete.... Look at Randy Moss too! NFL steroid problem, move over... there is a reason why in sports associations in japan disapprove of pot, yet they dont test for steroids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 Wow. king deflected a pass. Congrats. Its been a long time coming, because his last pass defensed was back in 2005. 1 pass deflection every 3 years. Canton, make room for Eric King! As for geisinger, he's just so good that he was inactive...again. Ah, the STAT PARROTING LIAR is at it again. How to judge a corner. The corner opposite Deion averaged 5 picks and many more PDs, while Deion averaged much lower. Why? LOL!!! The opposing QB knew not to throw against Deion. Indeed, the pathetic parrots here cannot ID where King was ever beaten, because he was rarely tested here. On a Monday Night against NE, Brady was sacked because he looked at the guy King had, pumped, and decided against throwing. Stats for corners are the opposite of a quality measure. Stats measure just how much a given corner was targeted. If one corner is thrown at 20 times and the other 3, Ramius is SURE the one who was thrown at 20 times is better, because Ramius understands precisely nothing about football except PARROTING. Justin was ACTIVE but did not play. Being a backup C is like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 I thought only stat parroting morons would introduce that line of reasoning. "understand," not introduce. I was trying to speak down to you birdbrains... The actual plays were very impressive. King was in single coverage in the corner of the endzone and swatted a catchable ball away. Twice he came up and make the solo tackle behind the LOS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDairis Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 I'm sorry, I thought this thread was supposed to be about New England quarterbacks? Let's keep it that way. Thanks. Thanks for noticing this time. Know anything about Kevin O'Connell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 Ah, the STAT PARROTING LIAR is at it again. How to judge a corner. The corner opposite Deion averaged 5 picks and many more PDs, while Deion averaged much lower. Why? LOL!!! The opposing QB knew not to throw against Deion. Indeed, the pathetic parrots here cannot ID where King was ever beaten, because he was rarely tested here. On a Monday Night against NE, Brady was sacked because he looked at the guy King had, pumped, and decided against throwing. Stats for corners are the opposite of a quality measure. Stats measure just how much a given corner was targeted. If one corner is thrown at 20 times and the other 3, Ramius is SURE the one who was thrown at 20 times is better, because Ramius understands precisely nothing about football except PARROTING. Got it. So when you simply stat parroted that king had as many tackles as Harper, that means that the texans were picking on King, because they know of his inability to provide any decent coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts