Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
If you take away our turnovers (one of which wasn't a turnover), take six off the board for the Raiders and give us 10ish back and its almost a blowout game.

 

:flirt:

Posted
That would be my point. You're using our opponent's combined record to judge the Bills, yet its the Bills who decide our opponent's combined record. :rolleyes:

 

Circular reasoning.

 

The Bills only decide a portion of their opponents record (In this case, one third. And to point out the obvious, by the end of the year, it will be 1/16th).

 

So, remove the Bills influence all together. What's left? Seahawks, Jags, and Raiders are all 1-1, for a combined 3-3 (.500).

Not exactly a gauntlet of a schedule.

 

It is only week 3, and nothing is written in stone until the end of the year. However, based on what we have seen so far, the Bills have faced some mediocre opponents. Of the 3 teams the Bills faced so far, I think Jacksonville will be the only team that will have a shot at the playoffs.

Posted
The Bills only decide a portion of their opponents record (In this case, one third. And to point out the obvious, by the end of the year, it will be 1/16th).

 

So, remove the Bills influence all together. What's left? Seahawks, Jags, and Raiders are all 1-1, for a combined 3-3 (.500).

Not exactly a gauntlet of a schedule.

 

It is only week 3, and nothing is written in stone until the end of the year. However, based on what we have seen so far, the Bills have faced some mediocre opponents. Of the 3 teams the Bills faced so far, I think Jacksonville will be the only team that will have a shot at the playoffs.

So against a schedule that is average (by definition), the Bills have performed spectacularly.

 

A perfect record against a middle-of-the-pack schedule? Not bad, not bad at all.

×
×
  • Create New...