The Dean Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 Missou is tearing up the field and scored a TD on their first drive. UB had a nice drive going, but staled at mid-field and punted to the 2 yard line. Missou tore the field up again, but UB stopped them at the 8. Field goal UB, kickoff return for a TD Missou 10, UB 7, late in the 1st quarter.
Stl Bills Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 What a BS call on the punt, now TD Buffalo..
PromoTheRobot Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 Halftime: Mizzou 20 UB 14. Not too bad considering the spread is 34pts. PTR
elcrusho Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 If you want to follow the action along http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/gamecast?gameId=282640142 this game isn't on TV is it?
PromoTheRobot Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 No TV, but I hope there will be some highlights on ESPN. WECK is streaming the game. I have to say the production leaves much to be desired. Brad, if you read this, how hard can it be to set up a proper audio stream, especially with the plug-n-play gear they sell these days? I know you are using Audio-over-IP. You can hear the stream chatter at times. PTR
PTS Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 TD UB! Earnest Jackson's third TD of the game for Buffalo. Missouri still up 27-21.
PromoTheRobot Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 TD UB! Earnest Jackson's third TD of the game for Buffalo. Missouri still up 27-21. end of 4th: Mizzou 33 UB21 PTR
The Dean Posted September 20, 2008 Author Posted September 20, 2008 Is Starks injured (or suspended, or something)? He doesn't seem to be playing.
PromoTheRobot Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 Friggin' UB I hope you're kidding. Missouri is ranked #5 after all. Is Starks injured (or suspended, or something)? He doesn't seem to be playing. Starks is injured, but not seriously. I think UB is saving him for their conference schedule. Big game next week against C. Michigan. PTR
drnykterstein Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 I hope you're kidding. Missouri is ranked #5 after all. ans4e64 has embarrassed himself enough on this board, I'm sure he was serious. Though I don't know how anyone takes his seriousness serious at all (if that makes any sense).
PromoTheRobot Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 Final Missouri-42 UB-21 (had the ball at the 4yd line and couldn't punch in one garbage TD.) Well they covered anyway. PTR
duey Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 I think UB gave Missouri a tougher game then they had all year. I certainly didn't expect the Bulls to win, and I'm pretty happy that they covered and held Missouri to their lowest point total of the year.
ans4e64 Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 ans4e64 has embarrassed himself enough on this board, I'm sure he was serious. Though I don't know how anyone takes his seriousness serious at all (if that makes any sense). I see you never checked that thread after I posted again. Still making yourself out to be a jackass I see. With reading coming so hard to you, its surprising to see you posting as much as you do. Its okay though, we can keep pretending that I don't know what I'm talking about, just so you can remain on your high horse. You totally did not understand the point I was making in that thread, which actually made you the retard. You probably should have read each post I wrote in that thread before flapping your gums.
ans4e64 Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 I hope you're kidding. Missouri is ranked #5 after all. No, not kidding at all.
The Dean Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 No, not kidding at all. So, now I'm confused. Was it because you were disappointed with UB's performance, or was it to the Bulls...period?
drnykterstein Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 I see you never checked that thread after I posted again. Still making yourself out to be a jackass I see. With reading coming so hard to you, its surprising to see you posting as much as you do. Its okay though, we can keep pretending that I don't know what I'm talking about, just so you can remain on your high horse. You totally did not understand the point I was making in that thread, which actually made you the retard. You probably should have read each post I wrote in that thread before flapping your gums. Hehe, glad you finally caught that Hey I just like people to be held accountable when they get caught making a fool out of themselves. I knew your point, and everyone knew your point. It's more fun to take you literal. Especially when I think it's harsh of you to call someone "retardedly ignorant" for a post like that. (and, to boot, they end up being right)
Recommended Posts