blzrul Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 I am not sure who hacked this but ... when you use Yahoo.com for email you have to know it could be hacked. She's surely not the only one who's ever been hacked. Just maybe the highest profile, to date. What is apparently the political issue is that the personal email account was used for state business. This is a no-no, for security / privacy reasons if nothing else. My company requires that all business be conducted on our network, behind our firewall, in order to protect our data as well as for legal/documentation purposes (of course email's backed up). I believe most state and local governments adhere to the same rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 My company requires that all business be conducted on our network, behind our firewall, in order to protect our data as well as for legal/documentation purposes (of course email's backed up). I believe most state and local governments adhere to the same rules. Adhere is not the same as Have. They all have them, but I would suggest that there is not a single organization that fully adhere's to its regulations. As a rule of thumb, the more important the person, the more likely they ignore the regs. How many bigshots of both political parties have been found to have taken classified documents home in the past decade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 I'm really starting to wonder how far this will go before even the far left is embarrassed by their own tactics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Somewhere John McCain is saying in a self satisfied voice, "There is a reason I don't use e-mail..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 I'm really starting to wonder how far this will go before even the far left is embarrassed by their own tactics. That would require they had some sense of shame. That hasn't been the case for a while now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 That would require they had some sense of shame. That hasn't been the case for a while now. They know no limits, shame does not exsist in the grey area. They cannot save themselves from their own folly. And I am loving every minute of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Never figured out that it had AT&T logos and not stars on the Donkey, did you? (This troll is awesome, btw) No troll, been here for ahwile original name never made it through the mishap of login trouble. And no, it was fun teasing you. It s kinda funny when you realize your servant is your master. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Why would I be ashamed? Democratz rule, others dr00l. Just read your bio. Says it all ,you are only 23 years old you don't know sh-- about sh--, wee boy. just keep doing what they tell ya No wonder you sound like a child. Isn't there a chat room titled Kiddies, Children and Wet Dreamers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 Just read your bio. Says it all ,you are only 23 years old you don't know sh-- about sh--, wee boy. just keep doing what they tell ya No wonder you sound like a child. Isn't there a chat room titled Kiddies, Children and Wet Dreamers. ya right u prolly old man like mccain can't drive a car cuz ur too senile dumbo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 *grabs a bag of popcorn and pulls up a chair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 *grabs a bag of popcorn and pulls up a chair if old man made popcorn he prolly burn it cuz he couldn't figure out the digital controls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Normally I agree... But, again: "No quarter asked, no quarter given." Now, it is all about: "Tit for tat, who's the bigger rat!" And normally I agree, but YOU are the folks who are embracing the platform of "CHANGE." What part of the "Obama Doctrine" (lol) of "CHANGE" does hacking into a personal private email account fit into? Seriously, youve pulled your hair out over your accusations of the Bushies playing fast and loose with people's privacy (which, to be fair, I can get my head around), youve whined about our "loss of basic rights".... yet you give a pass to whats going on here? How? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olivier in france Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 And normally I agree, but YOU are the folks who are embracing the platform of "CHANGE." What part of the "Obama Doctrine" (lol) of "CHANGE" does hacking into a personal private email account fit into? Seriously, youve pulled your hair out over your accusations of the Bushies playing fast and loose with people's privacy (which, to be fair, I can get my head around), youve whined about our "loss of basic rights".... yet you give a pass to whats going on here? How? there's a HUGE difference between journalists finding a way to hack the e mail box of someone and the Government voting laws so that they can go into the e mail boxes of everybody!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Yes, there is. The reporter or Obama flunkies doing it is a FELONY. The govt doing it is anti-terrorism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 there's a HUGE difference between journalists finding a way to hack the e mail box of someone and the Government voting laws so that they can go into the e mail boxes of everybody!!!! Thats like saying its OK to drink and drive on beer but not on vodka. At the end of the day, its an invasion of privacy, no matter who/what/why carried it out. And I dont think either is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olivier in france Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 The govt doing it is anti-terrorism. Yeah right!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olivier in france Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Thats like saying its OK to drink and drive on beer but not on vodka. At the end of the day, its an invasion of privacy, no matter who/what/why carried it out. And I dont think either is right. Am I (a frenchman) actually having a discussion with american conservatives about the evils of strong governments and being the one that actually worry about those evils?!!! I think Hell is freezing right now!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 What the hell is with this argument? Journalists didn't hack into the account, the Obama campaign didn't hack into the account, some random btard did who isn't affiliated with anyone. Talk about straw men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 What the hell is with this argument? Journalists didn't hack into the account, the Obama campaign didn't hack into the account, some random btard did who isn't affiliated with anyone. Talk about straw men. But a lot of liberals here (and elsewhere) are LOLing and high-fiving over it. These are the same folks who are up in arms over the current Admin "spying", state that the Patriot Act amounts to "invasion of privacy" and has these claims as one of the pillars of their hatred of the Admin. Thats my problem with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 But a lot of liberals here (and elsewhere) are LOLing and high-fiving over it. These are the same folks who are up in arms over the current Admin "spying", state that the Patriot Act amounts to "invasion of privacy" and has these claims as one of the pillars of their hatred of the Admin. Thats my problem with this. Your argument is that it's not possible to laugh at Sarah Palin's crime without approving of some random btards crime? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts