ROCCEO Posted October 22, 2004 Posted October 22, 2004 It's friday, no class, Im bored so i decided to research the debates of the summer a little bit. Kelsay v. Denney was one of my favorites and Through 5 games, here's their stat lines: Chris Kelsay 10 tackles 6 solo 1.0 sack 3.5 tackles for loss 1 FF 1 pass defensed Ryan Denney 9 tackles 3 solo 0.0 sacks 0 tackles for loss 0 FF 0 passes defensed discuss
John from Riverside Posted October 22, 2004 Posted October 22, 2004 It's friday, no class, Im bored so i decided to research the debates of the summer a little bit. Kelsay v. Denney was one of my favorites and Through 5 games, here's their stat lines: Chris Kelsay 10 tackles 6 solo 1.0 sack 3.5 tackles for loss 1 FF 1 pass defensed Ryan Denney 9 tackles 3 solo 0.0 sacks 0 tackles for loss 0 FF 0 passes defensed discuss 80966[/snapback] I have come to the conclusion that the bills are going to deny Kelsay the right to bud at the the End position until some sort of cap situation mandates they get rid of Denny....... I personally think they are holding back his development....the bottom line is that KELSAY IS MORE PRODUCTIVE......how many sacks does he have this year? Pressures?
BuffOrange Posted October 22, 2004 Posted October 22, 2004 The Van Pelt/Billy Joe of DE controversies, you gotta love it.
ROCCEO Posted October 22, 2004 Author Posted October 22, 2004 I agree that we just have to let him loose and that Denney is little more than a human blocking sled
RunTheBall Posted October 22, 2004 Posted October 22, 2004 Chris Kelsay 10 tackles 6 solo 1.0 sack 3.5 tackles for loss 1 FF 1 pass defensed Ryan Denney 9 tackles 3 solo 0.0 sacks 0 tackles for loss 0 FF 0 passes defensed discuss 80966[/snapback] Two wasted second round picks so far. RunTheBall
ROCCEO Posted October 22, 2004 Author Posted October 22, 2004 Two wasted second round picks so far. RunTheBall 81011[/snapback] So to you, the guy leading the team in tackles for a loss = wasted 2nd round pick?
RunTheBall Posted October 22, 2004 Posted October 22, 2004 So to you, the guy leading the team in tackles for a loss = wasted 2nd round pick? 81029[/snapback] Of the 4 guys on the line, only 2 (the ends) push into the backfield in this defense. That's what fat Sam is all upset about. So, out of the 3 defensive ends, one of them has tackled the enemy ballcarrier 3.5 times behind the line in FIVE games. WOW! That's production baby. What was I thinking. Between he and Denney we've got 2 serviceable backups. Add Schoebel to that list and now you've got 3 backups and no premier DE. I think he has potential, but there's a lot of potential on that line and not a lot of production. RunTheBall
Typical TBD Guy Posted October 22, 2004 Posted October 22, 2004 Kelsay should be the 100% starter. Ryan Denney had an extra year to develop and is also 5 years older than Kelsay. IMO he's nothing more than a legitimate run-stuffing backup DE.
ROCCEO Posted October 22, 2004 Author Posted October 22, 2004 Kelsay should be the 100% starter. Ryan Denney had an extra year to develop and is also 5 years older than Kelsay. IMO he's nothing more than a legitimate run-stuffing backup DE. 81132[/snapback] The statistics don't even indicate that he's all that much greater of a run stuffer than Kelsay (a team leading 3.5 tackles for a loss) http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/teamstats?te...r=2004&season=2
John from Riverside Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 Of the 4 guys on the line, only 2 (the ends) push into the backfield in this defense. That's what fat Sam is all upset about. So, out of the 3 defensive ends, one of them has tackled the enemy ballcarrier 3.5 times behind the line in FIVE games. WOW! That's production baby. What was I thinking. Between he and Denney we've got 2 serviceable backups. Add Schoebel to that list and now you've got 3 backups and no premier DE. I think he has potential, but there's a lot of potential on that line and not a lot of production. RunTheBall 81114[/snapback] Squirrelnuts there has a valid point (Just kiddin RDB.. ) There is a problem with the fundamental play of the defensive line and it has Sam Adams miffed....because they dont seem to want to let their 2 DT's (who are supposed to also be good pass disrupters) get into the backfield and after the QB......IF THEY DID it would create more opportunities for the ends in the defense and thus more stats for both Kelsay and Schrobel
Recommended Posts