IndyJay1234 Posted August 24, 2004 Author Share Posted August 24, 2004 faulk and priest are the only 2 RBs better than henry in this topic.... so now im confused..... are you trying to say St. Louis's backup is better than henry?? are you trying to say the bengals RBs are better than henry?? are you trying to say KC's first round draft pick last year, who hasnt done ANYTHING is better than henry?? are you saying there backups are better than McGahee?? (this may be true, since McGahee hasnt played a regular season game yet..) 5693[/snapback] No I am saying there is no controvery in STL or KC. The News had they been in either of the cities would blast away at these teams for acting foolishly when they had other needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 I hate to break it to you but the Buffalo News can say whatever they want because they are the only show in town. The reason something like this gets blown out of proportion is because there is NOTHING ELSE GOING ON IN BUFFALO to report on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 For what it's worth, I thought Larry Johnson looked VERY fast last night. St. Louis, on the other hand, seems to be in deep, deep trouble. Marshal Faulk stood on that sideline glaring at the field and you could read his mind: "I have to run behind THAT line all year???" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyJay1234 Posted August 24, 2004 Author Share Posted August 24, 2004 I hate to break it to you but the Buffalo News can say whatever they want because they are the only show in town. The reason something like this gets blown out of proportion is because there is NOTHING ELSE GOING ON IN BUFFALO to report on. 5741[/snapback] Sure they can say whatever they want. It is still lousy reporting. They however are not immune to people calling them out on the lousy reporting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 We need a special smilie just for the times that someone says "Ronnie Harmon (ugh)" just doesn't do it for me 5699[/snapback] I know... but the smiley technology might not be able to handle a smiley that screams, cries, runs around, smashes a TV and babbles "It was right in his goddamm hands!" over and over and over.... Any thoughts from the tech savvy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 Sure they can say whatever they want. It is still lousy reporting. They however are not immune to people calling them out on the lousy reporting. 5752[/snapback] I agree 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.