/dev/null Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/20...-hillary-a.html
KD in CA Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 How much more petrified could these losers be of little small town Sarah? Now even Biden is wishing they had picked Hillary?? But....but....we're the 'progressives'! The GOP isn't allowed to pick a woman for the ticket!
erynthered Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 How much more petrified could these losers be of little small town Sarah? Now even Biden is wishing they had picked Hillary?? But....but....we're the 'progressives'! The GOP isn't allowed to pick a woman for the ticket! Kankles to the rescue!!!
blzrul Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 How much more petrified could these losers be of little small town Sarah? Now even Biden is wishing they had picked Hillary?? But....but....we're the 'progressives'! The GOP isn't allowed to pick a woman for the ticket! That's not what he said. Nice try though.
KD in CA Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 That's not what he said. Nice try though. Really? ...and quite frankly, it [Hillary as VP] might have been a better pick than me. His inference that Palin's success in attracting women voters would have been negated if the Dems had picked Hillary couldn't have been any more obvious. Now the question is, just how desperate will the Dems get? Pretty funny how the libs were all wondering about the GOP dumping Plain when the real question is, how soon till the Dems dump Biden?
erynthered Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Really? His inference that Palin's success in attracting women voters would have been negated if the Dems had picked Hillary couldn't have been any more obvious. Now the question is, just how desperate will the Dems get? Pretty funny how the libs were all wondering about the GOP dumping Plain when the real question is, how soon till the Dems dump Biden? They eat their own, dont they.
KD in CA Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 They eat their own, dont they. Interesting....Intrade odds on Palin withdrawing are down to 6% from a high of 9%. Biden is up to 7% from a low of 3%. And yes I'm pissed at myself for not taking the time to toss a few bucks on McCain when he was at 38%.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Interesting....Intrade odds on Palin withdrawing are down to 6% from a high of 9%. Biden is up to 7% from a low of 3%. And yes I'm pissed at myself for not taking the time to toss a few bucks on McCain when he was at 38%. Agreed on that one, with the current electorate the way it is, you had to know that 38% wasn't going to last. My bet is that the elections overall vote will be no more than a 5% margin either way. And with two independents running, I bet no one gets more than 49% of the vote.
/dev/null Posted September 11, 2008 Author Posted September 11, 2008 how soon till the Dems dump Biden? They may not be able to dump him legally if the Democrats have submitted Joe Biden as their VP Nominee to the states boards of election (nor could the Republicans dump Palin). I think the only way a party can legally replace a candidates name on the ballot is if the candidate dies before the election I wonder if Bill still has that number of the guy hired to whack Vince Foster
Taro T Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 They may not be able to dump him legally if the Democrats have submitted Joe Biden as their VP Nominee to the states boards of election (nor could the Republicans dump Palin). I think the only way a party can legally replace a candidates name on the ballot is if the candidate dies before the election I wonder if Bill still has that number of the guy hired to whack Vince Foster It shouldn't be an issue in Jersey, but it might be a problem in the other 49.
KD in CA Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 It shouldn't be an issue in Jersey, but it might be a problem in the other 49. I thought of Senator Torch immediately. Shouldn't be a problem in the other 49 state either since Dems worry about the rules about as much as the Patriots* do.
blzrul Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Really? His inference that Palin's success in attracting women voters would have been negated if the Dems had picked Hillary couldn't have been any more obvious. Now the question is, just how desperate will the Dems get? Pretty funny how the libs were all wondering about the GOP dumping Plain when the real question is, how soon till the Dems dump Biden? “Make no mistake about this, Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let’s get that straight,” Biden said testily when a voter told Biden he was glad the Delaware senator had been chosen and not Clinton. Show me where he says "SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PICKED".
StupidNation Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 “Make no mistake about this, Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let’s get that straight,” Biden said testily when a voter told Biden he was glad the Delaware senator had been chosen and not Clinton. Show me where he says "SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PICKED". If you don't know what an "inference" is I recommend 6th grade.
jjamie12 Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 “Make no mistake about this, Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let’s get that straight,” Biden said testily when a voter told Biden he was glad the Delaware senator had been chosen and not Clinton. Show me where he says "SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PICKED". Maybe this quote isn't accurate, but the rest of the quote goes like this: "Make no mistake about this," Biden responded. "Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let’s get that straight. She’s a truly close personal friend, she is qualified to be president of the United States of America, she’s easily qualified to be vice president of the United States of America, and quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me. But she’s first rate, I mean that sincerely, she’s first rate, so let’s get that straight." Emphasis mine. Did you stop reading?
PastaJoe Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 If you don't know what an "inference" is I recommend 6th grade. How's 6th grade working out for you? Inference, like the McCain ad inferring that Obama voted for comprehensive sex education for kindergardeners instead of the reality of teaching them about reporting pedophiles and the difference between good touch/bad touch?
jjamie12 Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 How's 6th grade working out for you? Inference, like the McCain ad inferring that Obama voted for comprehensive sex education for kindergardeners instead of the reality of teaching them about reporting pedophiles and the difference between good touch/bad touch? Just as an aside... Your tag line under the avatar is pretty damn funny.
KD in CA Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Show me where he says "SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PICKED". I already did, but since I don't speak nut-job it probably didn't get through to you.
blzrul Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Maybe this quote isn't accurate, but the rest of the quote goes like this: Emphasis mine. Did you stop reading? No. But it's news to me that MIGHT = SHOULD.
blzrul Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 I already did, but since I don't speak nut-job it probably didn't get through to you. Oh sorry I was speaking to you in !@#$, which I thought was your native language.
/dev/null Posted September 11, 2008 Author Posted September 11, 2008 I already did, but since I don't speak nut-job it probably didn't get through to you. You can lead a horse to water and put lipstick on a, uh nevermind
Recommended Posts