drnykterstein Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Newt Gingrich pees upsidown. I saw it in Conservapedia.
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Palin is circumcised... Must be less messy.
olivier in france Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Palin is circumcised... Must be less messy. LOL By the way according to the recent "dangerous dogs law", in France we cut a little higher those unregistered pittbulls....
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 LOL By the way according to the recent "dangerous dogs law", in France we cut a little higher those unregistered pittbulls.... I am still baffled how she and others believe her "pitbull" comment is anywhere flattering or honorable... Nobody has explained that to me. Is this supposed to be a badge of honor? I am sure pitbulls are very nice animals at times... But, the rest of the world has to be shaking their head. ??
/dev/null Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Obama doesn't use a toilet. He just pees in the water as he walks on it. Then he turns it to wine
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Obama doesn't use a toilet. He just pees in the water as he walks on it. Then he turns it to wine Damn straight! He is The Messiah!
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2008 Author Posted September 11, 2008 Obama doesn't use a toilet. He just pees in the water as he walks on it. Then he turns it to wine I'm just the opposite. I turn wine into piss.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 I'm just the opposite. I turn wine into piss. That is "Whine"... check your spelling .... with McCain, I would have to say it "DEPENDS"
/dev/null Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 That is "Whine"... check your spelling .... with McCain, I would have to say it "DEPENDS" No need to get pissy
PastaJoe Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 No need to get pissy Urine rare form, this subject hasn't de-turd you from a steady stream of comments.
jjamie12 Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Urine rare form, this subject hasn't de-turd you from a steady stream of comments. Very, very nice... You're on your game these days!
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2008 Author Posted September 11, 2008 That is "Whine"... check your spelling .... with McCain, I would have to say it "DEPENDS" That's funny thread was to show the childishness of the whining from the left.
/dev/null Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Urine rare form, this subject hasn't de-turd you from a steady stream of comments. Thank you. Urinalysis is positive
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 That's funny thread was to show the childishness of the whining from the left. Guess it goes both ways... not that there is anything wrong with that
PastaJoe Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Thank you. Urinalysis is positive Just as long as my tests are negative.
molson_golden2002 Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Just as long as my tests are negative. Well coach, that leads me to the question of who is paying for your test? http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/elec...ape-exams_N.htm WASILLA, Alaska — In 2000, Alaska lawmakers learned that rural police agencies had been billing rape victims or their insurance companies $500 to $1,200 for the costs of the forensic medical examinations used to gather evidence. They quickly passed a law prohibiting the practice.According to the sponsor, Democrat Eric Croft, the law was aimed in part at Wasilla, where now-Gov. Sarah Palin was mayor. When it was signed, Wasilla's police chief expressed displeasure. Do we see a debate issue for the VP debate? In 2000, there were 497 rapes reported in Alaska, FBI statistics show. That's a rate of 79.3 per 100,000 residents, the highest in the nation. Nationally, victims' advocates have for years reported scattered instances of rape victims being required to pay for their forensic tests, says Ilse Knecht of the National Center for Victims of Crime in Washington. Those complaints have subsided somewhat after Congress in 2005 passed a law requiring states to provide rape exams free of charge or reimburse victims for the costs, says Knecht, whose group supported the provision. "The reason we passed the legislation was that we saw it was prevalent enough to be a pretty considerable problem," Knecht says. "There are no other victims of crime that end up being billed for evidence collection." The Senate version of the legislation that included the rape-exam provision was sponsored by Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, the Democratic vice presidential nominee. Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama was one of 58 co-sponsors; Republican presidential nominee John McCain was not.
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2008 Author Posted September 11, 2008 Guess it goes both ways... not that there is anything wrong with that Seeing the whiny left has taken over the topics here of late it's been leaning quite a bit more that way.
/dev/null Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Just as long as my tests are negative. You're a real Whiz kid
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Seeing the whiny left has taken over the topics here of late it's been leaning quite a bit more that way. So I said to the woman with the one leg shorter than the other, I said Eileen .. .
Recommended Posts