BeastMode54 Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 As we all know, McCargo was inactive last week. I just wondering whether all of you think he will be active this week due to a injury plagued interior offensive line, or will they keep him benched in favor of extra ST players as they did last week like Copeland Bryan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 As we all know, McCargo was inactive last week. I just wondering whether all of you think he will be active this week due to a injury plagued interior offensive line, or will they keep him benched in favor of extra ST players as they did last week like Copeland Bryan? I think being in the heat this week will make the Bills activate mccargo but it all depends on our game plan i guess. Withjocksonvilles running game i expect more D line to be in then ST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 I think being in the heat this week will make the Bills activate mccargo but it all depends on our game plan i guess. Withjocksonvilles running game i expect more D line to be in then ST I agree. Even with a banged up O-line, JAX is still a run-first team. The heat/humidity will be tough and I'd hate to see the 3 DT rotation get worn down. Even though Stroud knows how to play in early September heat better than anyone on the roster, he's acclimated to WNY conditions now, not JAX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMode54 Posted September 9, 2008 Author Share Posted September 9, 2008 I agree. Even with a banged up O-line, JAX is still a run-first team. The heat/humidity will be tough and I'd hate to see the 3 DT rotation get worn down. Even though Stroud knows how to play in early September heat better than anyone on the roster, he's acclimated to WNY conditions now, not JAX. I'd have to agree with you. I think the Bills should use the 4DT's they have and wreck havoc on that o-line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Agreeing with everyone else with this switch; Jax has to replace the middle 3 OL for this game. A daunting task in itself -sux to be them. Realistically, it's hard to imagine these three guys having the prep time necessary to study all the habits/tricks that film reveal on all 4 of our DT's, to say nothing of switching in DE's and 'the Creep' where the situation allows. It stands to reason they'll be very busy trying to find cohesivness playing together this week in practice. I'm getting so excited about this game that I'm scared Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Agreeing with everyone else with this switch; Jax has to replace the middle 3 OL for this game. A daunting task in itself -sux to be them. Realistically, it's hard to imagine these three guys having the prep time necessary to study all the habits/tricks that film reveal on all 4 of our DT's, to say nothing of switching in DE's and 'the Creep' where the situation allows. It stands to reason they'll be very busy trying to find cohesivness playing together this week in practice. I'm getting so excited about this game that I'm scared Great feeling , isn't it? I had those feeling in the 90's. Couldn't wait for the next game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDD Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 The guy better find some motivation and fast. He is fast approaching bust status. I think he plays against Jax in the heat where we need fresh DT's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Yeah, he's gotta play down there. Maybe we'll go short a WR or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsWatch Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 McCargo will be playing. Jacksonville has a running game and they need more linemen to press wonderboy. Seattle was very different team requiring less DL rushes making do with LB blitzes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildBills Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 anyone think they could be exploring the possibility of trading mcargo for a decent linebacker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDD Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 anyone think they could be exploring the possibility of trading mcargo for a decent linebacker? Yea, those are the same people working on the trade of Ashton Youboty for which there was no sustantiated proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildBills Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Yea, those are the same people working on the trade of Ashton Youboty for which there was no sustantiated proof. are you dumb? it was a simple question yes or no. i didn't need your ignorant sarcastic comment. thanks though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 anyone think they could be exploring the possibility of trading mcargo for a decent linebacker? There is a rumor they are shopping McCargo, although I haven't heard if they are looking specifically for a LB. Whether or not the rumor is true, is anyone's guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobillsinytown Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 The whole McCargo situation sucks. I was really hoping he would turn into something. But I'm not sure he should be activated. If his motivation is in question, then it's a gamble to activate him for a game that's going to test the team's determination in the heat. If he can't get motivated to play now, what's going to happen when he's hot and sweaty in Jacksonville? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Depends upon whether there's any tail to chase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobillsinytown Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Depends upon whether there's any tail to chase. Genius! You just found a way for them to get him to play. Just have one of the Jills bend over near the sidelines when the defense is on the field! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Genius! You just found a way for them to get him to play. Just have one of the Jills bend over near the sidelines when the defense is on the field! Have you seen this year's Jills? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobillsinytown Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Have you seen this year's Jills? Just went on the website. Now I'm all depressed. Looks like they went for character this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Yeah, he's gotta play down there. Maybe we'll go short a WR or something. Well Jenkins is one of the gunners, so they pretty much have to dress all 5 recievers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsZubaz Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 are you dumb? it was a simple question yes or no. i didn't need your ignorant sarcastic comment. thanks though Wow. That was snippy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts