buckeyemike Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 BTW, what do all these politicians have in common? They all seem to be Democrats. Go figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 When the difference was between McCain's "stay 100 years if necessary" and Obama's "timetable," I preferred Obama's position. In the interim, Obama slid and started saying that he'd trust his commanders and leave when stability allowed or some mealy-mouthed thing. But now that there is a rough timetable and the Iraqis want us out, both candidates have about the same position: leave when the Iraqis ask us to. That's about 2010, which is fine with me. Since there's little difference in the candidate's position now, it's not a convincing issue for me. So because the Bush Administration begrudgingly adopted Obama's position over McCain's before the election Obama doesn't get your vote? I guess it proves you can Change the direction of the nation and not get any credit. Of course, if McCain wins he can scrap the timetable, which he has yet to endorse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 When the heck did we switch this discussion from Detroit to NY? Probably when the original poster mentioned him in the original post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts