Max Fischer Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 It was only green because it was a close up of him. It was a picture of the school. Right. But audience for the production was the 40 million watching on TV who can't see the picture because 80% of the speech in a close up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JK2000 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 This is a line from the same article: "Eventually, the McCain camp today issued a statement insisting that that no mistake had been made. "The changing image-screen was linked to the American thematics of the speech and the public school was simply part of it," said spokesman Tucker Bounds. " Grasping at straws. grasping at straws. Nicer than the roman circus Nobama had So it's just a coincidence that a candidate whose entire candidacy is based upon him being a veteran chose some random middle school in California which just so happens to share the name as the countries most well known military medical center? You really are stupid. You can't admit that one of McCain's staffers screwed up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 So another Republican exaggeration. McCain even misstated that it was sold for a profit. She said it was put on ebay, implying it was sold there. It was not, it was sold privately at a $600,000 loss. See CNN this evening. Welcome Palin, now that the press got set up on the baby thing, they are checking their facts and setting you up. Watch the exaggerations and implied accomplishments that are not real. I am sure there will be more. Next on CNN... Troopergate, the Trooper that Palin is going after, is being interviewed. Should be interesting. Did she imply that it sold on eBay, or did you infer it from hearing it? What if she had listed it in multiple sales outlets? Would that make her claim any less valid that she got rid of the plane? If she had said, "I listed the plane at Dove Brothers" would that make the same point? Or should she have said on the stage, "I listed the plane on eBay, but it didn't sell there. So, I listed it at another place. But it didn't sell. So, we then hired a broker who started calling everyone he knew. He finally sold the plane. Whoosh, what a whirlwind of a process that was. Are you people still with me?" As for the los or gain on the sale, I don't trust people who can barely balance a checkbook to properly explain gains and losses of depreciating assets and which accounting conventions were used to book the assets and depreciation methods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 So it's just a coincidence that a candidate whose entire candidacy is based upon him being a veteran chose some random middle school in California which just so happens to share the name as the countries most well known military medical center? You really are stupid. You can't admit that one of McCain's staffers screwed up? So what if it was a green background for what, 20 seconds? I was concentrating on what he was saying, You lib loons are like "Ooh-shiny thing!" Again, grasping at straws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JK2000 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 So what if it was a green background for what, 20 seconds? I was concentrating on what he was saying, You lib loons are like "Ooh-shiny thing!" Again, grasping at straws. Would you say McCain "must have done good"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 So what if it was a green background for what, 20 seconds? I was concentrating on what he was saying, You lib loons are like "Ooh-shiny thing!" Again, grasping at straws. Typical Wacka/Coulter/Hannity/O'Reilly juvenile response when he can't even concede the most innocuous observation of his candidate's performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Typical Wacka/Coulter/Hannity/O'Reilly juvenile response when he can't even concede the most innocuous observation of his candidate's performance. So, were you listening to the substance of the speech or looking for shiny things??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 So, were you listening to the substance of the speech or looking for shiny things??? You mean how the very party that screwed up the economy, the federal budget, and two wars wants to change things by asking for another four years? Very substantive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts