BuffaloBud Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Oh brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 mmmm Steak Hoagie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 mmmm Steak Hoagie Someone say steak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deep2evans Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 really? the team may as well move? seriously? get a grip and think for more than 2 seconds before mind!@#$ing all of us with a worthless post that epitomizes stupidity. a starter is gone, so move the team. jesus h christ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 If anyone's the troll it's you. Crowell has been one of the team's most consistent performer over the years. To put him on IR for a 2-4 week injury is just plain asinine. Especially with this team's depth at linebacker. This is a JV front office at it's best. It's the same front office that has produced one of the longest playoff droughts in the NFL. What do they get in return? Promotions!!! Each and every one of them! Putting Crowell on IR for a 2-4 rehab is puzzling. Poz you can understand because he was going to miss most of the year. You can't run a player short 10-12 weeks. It's not like the Bills are saving Crowell's salary by putting him on IR, as some misinformed conspiracy theorists have suggested. He gets paid no matter what. And he really made the call? The FO or Jauron? Did the Bills doctors feel he wasn't going to be 100% after 4 weeks anyway? Was it punishment for not getting surgery sooner? Did they want to get Costanza back? Very odd. There's more going on than we know here. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts