Got_Wood Posted August 30, 2008 Posted August 30, 2008 As an OT for the Cardinals. Always thought he was a better tackle than a guard. Would actually be nice to have him around right now.
ans4e64 Posted August 30, 2008 Posted August 30, 2008 Actually, I always thought he was a better guard than tackle.
billybob Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Here's a question- how much better is Dockery than Gandy at LG
Captain Hindsight Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Here's a question- how much better is Dockery than Gandy at LG Alot Wouldnt mind having him over Chambers at RT tho
DDD Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Here's a question- how much better is Dockery than Gandy at LG Not worth the extra 5+ million Levy threw at him last year.
silvermike Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Not worth the extra 5+ million Levy threw at him last year. You have got to be kidding.
billybob Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 My answer is he's a little better than Gandy- Dockery is a pretty good Pass blocker but he is no where near the run blocker I was expecting- In fact I have to admit I was wrong about Dockery and Walker- Dockery is not as good as I expected and Walker is better than I expected.
julian Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Playing with a rookie QB and RB, on a line in its first year together... I thought he was very good. I mean Lynch had over 1100 yrds in just 13 games, and the line gave up the least amount of sacks in club history. With Peters, year 2 for them will be even better. The line as a whole will be considered one of the better units in the NFL. If there is a weak link, its Fowler...no question. With a quality center, this line could be awsome.
billybob Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Playing with a rookie QB and RB, on a line in its first year together... I thought he was very good. I mean Lynch had over 1100 yrds in just 13 games, and the line gave up the least amount of sacks in club history.With Peters, year 2 for them will be even better. The line as a whole will be considered one of the better units in the NFL. If there is a weak link, its Fowler...no question. With a quality center, this line could be awsome. I'd rate the best run blockers as Walker, Peters, big drop, Dockery, more drop, Butler, even more drop Fowler- Paul Hamilton always says he's confused as to why the Bills line can pass block well but they can't run block- I think it's kinda simple the Bills have two guards built more like tackles 6,6 330 Dockery and 6,7 315 Brad Butler - unless he's much stronger it's gonna be really hard for a 6,7 315 guy to get great leverage on a 6,3 320 guy.
eball Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Here we go...the OL experts are out in force again. I'd like to know how many posters on TSW really have any clue at all what they're talking about when they "evaluate" OL play. Seriously. I know I don't, which is why I rarely comment on it. I believe most are talking out of their asses.
Fingon Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Here we go...the OL experts are out in force again. I'd like to know how many posters on TSW really have any clue at all what they're talking about when they "evaluate" OL play. Seriously. I know I don't, which is why I rarely comment on it. I believe most are talking out of their asses. All you need to know is that Gandy has cement blocks for feet.
ganesh Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 gandy was horrible as an OT at pass blocking. I just saw the waiver wire and Wayne Gandy the former LT of the STeelers was released.....He would be an ideal backup to have until Peters returns.
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Here we go...the OL experts are out in force again. I'd like to know how many posters on TSW really have any clue at all what they're talking about when they "evaluate" OL play. Seriously. I know I don't, which is why I rarely comment on it. I believe most are talking out of their asses. I believe it too.. but it all follows a really simple formula: If he is on the Bills OL, he sucks, as Gandy was the butt of many critical comments. When he is not, he is an upgrade over [fill in name of current OL whipping boy here]. The use of specific names of players make the analysis sound so much smarter.
keepthefaith Posted August 31, 2008 Posted August 31, 2008 Here we go...the OL experts are out in force again. I'd like to know how many posters on TSW really have any clue at all what they're talking about when they "evaluate" OL play. Seriously. I know I don't, which is why I rarely comment on it. I believe most are talking out of their asses. This is an outstanding comment on your part. We don't know shyt about evaluating players at nearly every position.
Recommended Posts