OCinBuffalo Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 I'm gonna respond once more and then I'm done, cuz it's a waste of bits trying to tell you anything, as you continually win the most closed minded, holier than thou prize on this board.... my statements on Rendell have nothing whatsoever to do with any Obama or democratic or liberal or left wing talking points and/or viewpoints. I've never even heard or read what they had to say about him. They are based on my own opinions from watching him, admittedly not throughout his career. He says STUPID things to his audiences and then gets blasted for it. You seem enamored with twisting it around to be some sort of positive or intended result. It's not about how many votes he gets, what states he delivers, how many times he is on tv, or how much political capital he has, or anything else besides his lack of ability to consider the repercussions of his (verbal) actions. That's my viewpoint, nothing more, nothing less. What repercussions? Pissing you off? Like he or anyone cares. Define these terrible consequences or stop wasting my time. Sorry, but your viewpoint is patently wrong, nothing more, nothing less. I do close my mind when I hear something I know to be wrong. Why? Because it's WRONG! Next you'll be telling me I should open my mind to 2+3 = 4! Another fine example of "relativism" on display here. I have given you ample evidence of why it is wrong, and you have consistently done nothing to prove or define what "repercussions" you are talking about, their nature, or what damage they can possibly do. Sorry if no one believes in your boogie man nor fears your passive-aggressive, "Rendell better consider the repercussions of pissing me or Obama off" nonsense. It appears you can't tell the difference between Rendell doing what a solid political operative does and what normal people do, and that's too bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts