DC Tom Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Inconsistency we can believe in. Really, though...what did anyone expect? Primary campaigning is geared toward the party core; now he's trying to woo moderates.
pBills Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Hopefully McCain won't claim that he does not change positions.
Chilly Posted August 18, 2008 Author Posted August 18, 2008 Inconsistency we can believe in. Really, though...what did anyone expect? Primary campaigning is geared toward the party core; now he's trying to woo moderates. yap, still fun to laugh at Hopefully McCain won't claim that he does not change positions. plz 2 understand difference between campaigning on new poltick and old politick.
JK2000 Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Meanwhile 8 years of a President who doesn't change positions has been terrific. "The greatest thing about this man is he's steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday. Events can change; this man's beliefs never will." -Stephen Colbert on GWB
Chilly Posted August 18, 2008 Author Posted August 18, 2008 Meanwhile 8 years of a President who doesn't change positions has been terrific. "The greatest thing about this man is he's steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday. Events can change; this man's beliefs never will." -Stephen Colbert on GWB plz 2 read quote
/dev/null Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 plz 2 read quote What's Vince Young got to do with this?
pBills Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 yap, still fun to laugh at plz 2 understand difference between campaigning on new poltick and old politick. They both have flipped, changed or altered some of their original stances. Expected. One states change. The other the Straight Talk Express.
Chilly Posted August 18, 2008 Author Posted August 18, 2008 What's Vince Young got to do with this? He scored higher on the wonderlic than our good friend? They both have flipped, changed or altered some of their original stances. Expected. One states change. The other the Straight Talk Express. Read quote in thread title. Compare to actions. Read campaign messages. Compare messages to McCain. Understand difference.
billsfanone Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Who doesn't change their minds in life? Given different experiences, changing times, etc???
pBills Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 He scored higher on the wonderlic than our good friend? Read quote in thread title. Compare to actions. Read campaign messages. Compare messages to McCain. Understand difference. Dude I understand. To me someone saying "Change to Believe In" - stating that they are going to change DC. Is just as strong as a statement as McCain's "Straight-Talk Express" - which states that he is this maverick politician and what he says is straight-talk. No double speak. Now compare actions - THEY BOTH HAVE FLIP FLOPPED, CHANGED OR ALTERED THEIR OPINIONS. Please tell me now McCain's is different because his flip flops don't mean as much as Obama's flip flops. Give me a break. Personally, I believe they are allowed to do that. I would like to see that. It's better to have someone review the facts and then be able to adjust if need be. Not be pig headed and stay one way for fear of being called a flip-flopper.
JK2000 Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Dude I understand. To me someone saying "Change to Believe In" - stating that they are going to change DC. Is just as strong as a statement as McCain's "Straight-Talk Express" - which states that he is this maverick politician and what he says is straight-talk. No double speak. Now compare actions - THEY BOTH HAVE FLIP FLOPPED, CHANGED OR ALTERED THEIR OPINIONS. Please tell me now McCain's is different because his flip flops don't mean as much as Obama's flip flops. Give me a break. Personally, I believe they are allowed to do that. I would like to see that. It's better to have someone review the facts and then be able to adjust if need be. Not be pig headed and stay one way for fear of being called a flip-flopper. I think that their is a big difference between "flip flopping" on a postion like NASA funding and "flip flopping" on one's core values and beliefs. I'll worry about "flip flopping" when/if McCain says we shouldn't be drilling offshore and Obama says we need to send more troops to Iraq. These "gotcha" stories are already tiresome and it's only August.
PastaJoe Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 I think that their is a big difference between "flip flopping" on a postion like NASA funding and "flip flopping" on one's core values and beliefs. I'll worry about "flip flopping" when/if McCain says we shouldn't be drilling offshore and Obama says we need to send more troops to Iraq. These "gotcha" stories are already tiresome and it's only August. But until this year McCain was against further drilling offshore, and now he's pushing it, so he's already crossed your threshhold. I think the whole drilling debate is silly anyways, because it makes it sound like there is no drilling currently going on, which unfortunately is what some uninformed voters probably believe based on what they've heard from the talking points.
Chilly Posted August 18, 2008 Author Posted August 18, 2008 Dude I understand. Obviously you don't. If you did, you wouldn't have needed to make this post, would you? To me someone saying "Change to Believe In" - stating that they are going to change DC. Very good. Now, take into account the Washington Insider rhetoric, along with the changing the culture of Washington rhetoric. Is just as strong as a statement as McCain's "Straight-Talk Express" - which states that he is this maverick politician and what he says is straight-talk. No double speak. Ah, but he doesn't paint himself as a Washington outsider now does he? He paints himself as a governmental reformer against lobbying interests. Now compare actions - THEY BOTH HAVE FLIP FLOPPED, CHANGED OR ALTERED THEIR OPINIONS. Please tell me now McCain's is different because his flip flops don't mean as much as Obama's flip flops. Give me a break. Hmm... Washington Outsider vs Washington Insider. Yep, they have the same context, don't they? Personally, I believe they are allowed to do that. I would like to see that. It's better to have someone review the facts and then be able to adjust if need be. Not be pig headed and stay one way for fear of being called a flip-flopper. The issue is not the changing of positions (Obama's change was a good one). The issue here is he's claimed he's a Washington outsider and different from everyone currently in Washington when he's clearly not. Plz see quote above.
Chilly Posted August 18, 2008 Author Posted August 18, 2008 I think that their is a big difference between "flip flopping" on a postion like NASA funding and "flip flopping" on one's core values and beliefs. I'll worry about "flip flopping" when/if McCain says we shouldn't be drilling offshore and Obama says we need to send more troops to Iraq. These "gotcha" stories are already tiresome and it's only August. Oh, you mean like how Obama changed his position on offshore drilling?
DC Tom Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Meanwhile 8 years of a President who doesn't change positions has been terrific. "The greatest thing about this man is he's steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday. Events can change; this man's beliefs never will." -Stephen Colbert on GWB I think that their is a big difference between "flip flopping" on a postion like NASA funding and "flip flopping" on one's core values and beliefs. You really are a bit of a dimwit, aren't you?
pBills Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Obviously you don't. If you did, you wouldn't have needed to make this post, would you? Very good. Now, take into account the Washington Insider rhetoric, along with the changing the culture of Washington rhetoric. Ah, but he doesn't paint himself as a Washington outsider now does he? He paints himself as a governmental reformer against lobbying interests. Hmm... Washington Outsider vs Washington Insider. Yep, they have the same context, don't they? The issue is not the changing of positions (Obama's change was a good one). The issue here is he's claimed he's a Washington outsider and different from everyone currently in Washington when he's clearly not. Quit acting as though you and your opinions are the be all, end all here. BOTH paint themselves as governmental reformers in many ways. McCain may not say that he's a Washington outsider - but he always acts and states that he's some sort of maverick - he's not. I do see your point, however for once expand it and blast McCain once and while. The way he's labeled himself just in this campaign (and flipped) to many is just as bad.
JK2000 Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 You really are a bit of a dimwit, aren't you? Wow, good one.
Chilly Posted August 18, 2008 Author Posted August 18, 2008 Quit acting as though you and your opinions are the be all, end all here. No. BOTH paint themselves as governmental reformers in many ways. McCain may not say that he's a Washington outsider - but he always acts and states that he's some sort of maverick - he's not. And? I do see your point Particularly funny given quote #1. however for once expand it and blast McCain once and while. You mean like.... http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...3&hl=McCain http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...6&hl=McCain http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...1&hl=McCain There's a reason why I don't blast McCain much on this board: There isn't anyone who is completely and utterly infatuated with McCain the way the libs on this board are with Obama. The way he's labeled himself just in this campaign (and flipped) to many is just as bad. Particularly funny given quote #3.
JK2000 Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Obviously you don't. If you did, you wouldn't have needed to make this post, would you? Very good. Now, take into account the Washington Insider rhetoric, along with the changing the culture of Washington rhetoric. Ah, but he doesn't paint himself as a Washington outsider now does he? He paints himself as a governmental reformer against lobbying interests. Hmm... Washington Outsider vs Washington Insider. Yep, they have the same context, don't they? The issue is not the changing of positions (Obama's change was a good one). The issue here is he's claimed he's a Washington outsider and different from everyone currently in Washington when he's clearly not. Plz see quote above. So how is naming your bus "Straight Talk Express" and calling yourself a "maverick" not impling that you're a "different" "Washington outsider"?
Recommended Posts