krazykat Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 If anything, it should tell Goodell et al. that they need to do something about the preseason situation, as was rumored with retraction of one game and expanding to a 17-game season. Big surprise that people don't give a flying sh-- about games that mean nothing in the standings!? Lots of popular teams have attendance trouble for what is tantamount to glorified practice sessions; only the hardcore fans care about it, and even then.... I think butts (PAYING butts, that is) will be in the seats in Toronto in Dec. when it matters. People should reserve any final judgment at least until then, and probably not until the game up there next year. In addition to the retraction of a game, it might be prudent to make the preseason results count for something. What, I don't know. Some perk that's not too big, not too small. But the MLB All-Star game certainly got more interesting when the winning league got home-field advantage during the WS --- all of a sudden, people had a bit of a stake. Finally, for anyone happy about the low attendance, it isn't good for the team. This Toronto partnership thing has to be successful for the future of this franchise in the new era of Snyder & Jones. W/o it, we sink and the team will move; with it, the NFL in this region will be possible. Again, I fully expect a large crowd in Dec., a good game vs. the Fish, and I hope it translates to some corporate support from Toronto at RWS. (Should be easier now with the strong Canadian dollar). Some good points. Also keep ion mind that they disallow tailgating in Toronto, or maybe Canada altogether. Who in their right mind is going to lay out $350 plus parking plus concessions/dinner, etc. for a preseason game in which a bunch of guys that are going to be washing pots and pans in four weeks play a half of football, especially when they can't tailgate.
UConn James Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 I also think you should find the exact broadcast of that supposed statement. Sounds very unprofessional for Goodell to go on the air and say something like that. And what was Goodell doing in Minnesota? Not saying he wasn't there, but this reeks of fish more than the best fish story. I don't doubt that Goodell might have said he was disappointed by it. Hell, I'm disappointed by it. For sure, 54,000 would have been better than 17,000. But then, Goodell and even Ralph and Rogers probably projected this --- they didn't get where they are by being stupid. The two preseason games were never the main driver in the 8-game deal. It's Toronto's reception to the regular season games that really count. Disappointing, yes. But no way can anyone fairly compare this to last year's London game, and thatt's probably not what Goodell meant, if he did make a comment.
Stussy109 Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 The Miami game being played in Toronto still pisses me off. Having a home game at RWS vs Miami in December has usually just about guaranteed a win. Now it's going to be in a dome?? With the way Edwards has played previously in sh------- weather games like the browns, and the giants game, I'm thrilled we're playing in a dome.
krazykat Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 I don't doubt that Goodell might have said he was disappointed by it. Hell, I'm disappointed by it. For sure, 54,000 would have been better than 17,000. But then, Goodell and even Ralph and Rogers probably projected this --- they didn't get where they are by being stupid. The two preseason games were never the main driver in the 8-game deal. It's Toronto's reception to the regular season games that really count. Disappointing, yes. But no way can anyone fairly compare this to last year's London game, and thatt's probably not what Goodell meant, if he did make a comment. Ralph got where he is by being lucky. All he did was sink $25K into a team fortysome years ago. If he were that bright he would have found a way to prevent Polian from being fired. Oops, that's right, he fired him. ; ) Same for AJ Smith both of whom have excelled since leaving. He has done very little for the league since and has recently made a name for himself as a cranky old whiner. He was flat out dumb to insist on keeping the Miami rivalry above everything else when they did the divisional realignment. He has never hired a great GM for this team besides Polian who was a rush decision due to a death of then Terry Bledsoe or whatever his name was. When he meddles in his team's affairs we as fans usually come out on the short end of the stick just like Snyder in Washington and Davis in Oakland. But my point was that if Toronto had a season ticket base like all other teams, besides ours, then we wouldn't be having this conversation. If the Jets, Redskins, Giants, or Pats charged $350 per ticket and made every ticket available to a preseason game of theirs, I doubt that they would have more than ten or twenty thousand people attend either. As it is, most people with preseason tickets try to unload them or they go unused. Will the Ralph be full for the Detroit preseason game, no. So why do we hold a vastly different standard for a preseason game in Toronto? Now if the Miami game fails to sell and we're playing well, then we can start talking. But that will sell out. Actually, aren't they just a few thousand tickets short of selling out the regular season home games there for the next three seasons. I think so. Once the season gets going the rest will sell too. Either way, the cheap (around $200) tickets sold out and it was just the expensive ones that didn't. And if they lowered the prices to what we pay in Buffalo they would have sold out instantly. You have to compare apples to apples here.
SouthernMan Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 so your saying fans with no tickets shouldn't be able to have fun and support there team in the parking lots?...I think this was a very bad move on the Bears part...Tailgateing is a huge part of the game-day experience...I know all of you would be pi$$d if Ralph came out and threw everyone that didn't buy a ticket out of the parking lot I'd bet the move was made to protect the personal property of those who paid $25 to lease a parking space for the afternoon while they attend the game. First, they don't want to not have enough parking for those going into the stadium, and secondly, they want to keep loiterers, burglars, gasoline thieves, car theives, and other n'er-do-wells away from the property of the game patrons. What sort of element is just hangin around parking lots? A bunch of no goods who don't have their own digs or enough scratch to go to a local establishment full of rowdy fans? It'd bet it's the same bunch of losers who don't have a pot to piss in and invade our spaces like local parks and so forth. Good for Chicago. I wish they'd have better protection for my vehicle and property at the Orchard Park lots. Between Electronics, GPS units, and other valuables, it's not unlikely that many of these cars have hundreds of dollars worth of property inside. Reducing risk of criminal activity is a big plus as far as I'm concerned. It's families attending games who will ultimately keep the team in Buffalo - not a bunch of bums.
billsfanone Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Canadians are not good sports fans. Period.
Flbillsfan#1 Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Ralph got where he is by being lucky. All he did was sink $25K into a team fortysome years ago. If he were that bright he would have found a way to prevent Polian from being fired. Oops, that's right, he fired him. ; ) Same for AJ Smith both of whom have excelled since leaving. He has done very little for the league since and has recently made a name for himself as a cranky old whiner. He was flat out dumb to insist on keeping the Miami rivalry above everything else when they did the divisional realignment. He has never hired a great GM for this team besides Polian who was a rush decision due to a death of then Terry Bledsoe or whatever his name was. When he meddles in his team's affairs we as fans usually come out on the short end of the stick just like Snyder in Washington and Davis in Oakland. But my point was that if Toronto had a season ticket base like all other teams, besides ours, then we wouldn't be having this conversation. If the Jets, Redskins, Giants, or Pats charged $350 per ticket and made every ticket available to a preseason game of theirs, I doubt that they would have more than ten or twenty thousand people attend either. As it is, most people with preseason tickets try to unload them or they go unused. Will the Ralph be full for the Detroit preseason game, no. So why do we hold a vastly different standard for a preseason game in Toronto? Now if the Miami game fails to sell and we're playing well, then we can start talking. But that will sell out. Actually, aren't they just a few thousand tickets short of selling out the regular season home games there for the next three seasons. I think so. Once the season gets going the rest will sell too. Either way, the cheap (around $200) tickets sold out and it was just the expensive ones that didn't. And if they lowered the prices to what we pay in Buffalo they would have sold out instantly. You have to compare apples to apples here. Comparing apples to oranges, the Jets, Redskins, Giants & Pats have been around a LONG time. A preseason game in those cities doesn't mean much. Toronto however hasn't had an NFL game in that city in YEARS, so preseason or no it is more of an event than those other cities. Aside from that Rodgers wanted to show the NFL how well Toronto would support the NFL, and led us all to believe the game would be sold out.
PromoTheRobot Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Rogers had better come up with a creative solution to the mess they created. They flat out charged too much for tickets, even for money-to-burn Torontonians. Rogers has to figure out how to reduce prices without losing face. Either quietly rebate people who bought tickets and release a new price structure, or bonus people free tickets. I'm not convinced the Miami game sells out just because its regular season. PTR
MDH Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 so your saying fans with no tickets shouldn't be able to have fun and support there team in the parking lots?...I think this was a very bad move on the Bears part...Tailgateing is a huge part of the game-day experience...I know all of you would be pi$$d if Ralph came out and threw everyone that didn't buy a ticket out of the parking lot I'm sure it has to do with policing the unruly fans in the parking lot. Teams have enough trouble with the drunks in the stands, I'm sure they don't want to have to deal with the drunks in the parking lots who don't even have a ticket. If people acted like adults instead of idiots while drinking I’m guessing this move wouldn’t be necessary by the Bears. I wouldn’t be surprised if other teams headed in this direction soon.
RayFinkle Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 There is no way Goodell said anything close to that Agreed.
davefan66 Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Buffalo should tell Toronto that the roof has to be open for the game..snow or no snow...but then again..we have a Cali QB and a Cali RB..maybe the roof closed will help us more than hurt Miami According to WGR, the roof was supposed to be open for the 1st half of the game, but it started to rain and the roof was closed. Apparently, the field has no real drainage system, and can't support any water.
krazykat Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Comparing apples to oranges, the Jets, Redskins, Giants & Pats have been around a LONG time. A preseason game in those cities doesn't mean much. Toronto however hasn't had an NFL game in that city in YEARS, so preseason or no it is more of an event than those other cities. Aside from that Rodgers wanted to show the NFL how well Toronto would support the NFL, and led us all to believe the game would be sold out. Fine, then judge by regular season games. Even Americans won't pay what they're charging up there for preseason games. You missed my point entirely. I mean what if the prices were $1K per ticket and they then said, "see, no one wants a team in Toronto." Well this just in, but if the prices here were half of that our boat would be half (or less) full each and every week and it would have absolutely nothing to do with a shortage of fans. How long a team has been around and the accompanying waiting list is an even more serious demand builder than available ticktes at three bills plus. I mean if you want to use a preseason game as a gage, feel free. I think it's meaningless and at the prices they're charging, to be over 80% sold out for the regular season games for the next three years, is impressive to me. That's probably the equivalent revenue from over a third of our home schedule in any given year per year.
krazykat Posted August 18, 2008 Posted August 18, 2008 Rogers had better come up with a creative solution to the mess they created. They flat out charged too much for tickets, even for money-to-burn Torontonians. Rogers has to figure out how to reduce prices without losing face. Either quietly rebate people who bought tickets and release a new price structure, or bonus people free tickets. I'm not convinced the Miami game sells out just because its regular season. PTR It's mostly sold out for the regular season. They have like 10K tickets remaining and that is presumably 10K for each game. What's the capacity at Roger's? 46K or something.
Recommended Posts