Zona Posted August 15, 2008 Posted August 15, 2008 I like that formation the best. It seems that we have the perfect combination of run and pass threat. I hope we see less and less of Barnes and more of Royal out wide or Hardy, Parrish and Evans out there...
Zona Posted August 15, 2008 Author Posted August 15, 2008 I still say keep Barnes for short yardage plays. sure, but not for the "base" offense. I like the dual threat that 3 or 4 wideouts offers.
VOR Posted August 15, 2008 Posted August 15, 2008 sure, but not for the "base" offense. I like the dual threat that 3 or 4 wideouts offers. I'm in violent agreement with you.
Zona Posted August 15, 2008 Author Posted August 15, 2008 I never understood why we had to go with a power control game because of weather. If we could run the K-gun with Jimbo, why not with This team? The weather hasn't changed that much in 18 years has it?
cody Posted August 15, 2008 Posted August 15, 2008 I never understood why we had to go with a power control game because of weather. If we could run the K-gun with Jimbo, why not with This team? The weather hasn't changed that much in 18 years has it? I think our base offense should be three wide. I think it's better to have parrish on the field than Barnes or an H-back. Marshawn proved last year that he can be productive without a lead blocker. I don't think we have the right tight ends to run the K-gun. Royal & co do not even look like thay play the same position as McKeller & co. But some version of a 3 wide base offense would get the best skill position players on the field more.
Recommended Posts