KD in CA Posted August 14, 2008 Posted August 14, 2008 Everyone needs to think back to when they got behind MADD because Drunk Driving really sucks. Would any of you really have believed that the government would start seizing people's vehicles because they were sleeping one off instead of driving or taxing beer to the point that a sixer of sh------- American Lager is now over $7? And don't forget changing the rules so a .08 is now "drunk".
ieatcrayonz Posted August 15, 2008 Posted August 15, 2008 THISIS NOT ABOUT A PHARMACY NOT STOCKING BIRTH CONTROL PILLS. THIS IS ABOUT GIVING A PHARMACIST THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO FILL A PRESCRIPTION OF A DRUG THAT THE STORE CARRIES BASED OFF THEIR MORAL BELIEFS. JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE ZITZ GALORE DOES NOT MEAN YOU GET TO DECIDE WHAT DRUG ALL PHARMACIES SHOULD CARRY. THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS SUCH AS CLEARASIL AND SAND PAPER.
Boatdrinks Posted August 16, 2008 Posted August 16, 2008 Your argument is that BC is essential to controlling the population of unwanted children, but BC is only 1.7% more effective than a condom. Keep on the socialist think tank... you will only bankrupt everyone before you realize carrying every single medicine ever invented is a waste of money. The effectiveness isn't the point dude. Condoms suck. Kinda kill the sensation, you know?
Recommended Posts