1billsfan Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 Agree. One of these 2 QBs shows more determination with his play and appears more the emotional field general with the entire offense. One of them looks more willing and able to make the big play. One has more experience. One is more athletic and can use that to make a play now and then. One is probably tougher to game plan against. In every case it's not Trent. I really think for this front office, the choice has come down to money. You got it. It's going to take years before this team recovers from Jauron's massive brain fart in regards to his QB decision making. Losman's going to go to a team that will reap the rewards of acquiring a very talented player who's been through his tough growing pains and who's ready to become one of the league's top five QBs. The Bills are going to pay for their lack of patience and deeply regret every listening to Bill Walsh waxing poetic about the well-spoken kid from Stanford. I just don't see Edwards being anything other than the second coming of Chad Pennington. All of you ridiculous Losman haters and bashers will eventually turn against "The One" when we are at mid season and he only has 5 touchdown passes.
The Senator Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.He has a future in the US Senate. Is Ted Kennedy retiring?
ndirish1978 Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 OK MY TEAM OUR team. Sorry, but if you can't spell, don't expect your opinion to carry much weight around here.
ieatcrayonz Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 OUR team. Sorry, but if you can't spell, don't expect your opinion to carry much weight around here. Funny how people who are critical of Trent and have bad grammar are the worst kind of bad grammar people there are.
Recommended Posts