finknottle Posted August 7, 2008 Posted August 7, 2008 You guys are attacking a strawman here. There is not meaningfull support for military intervention in Sudan among the withdraw-from-Iraq crowd. If there were then there might be something worth debating.
DC Tom Posted August 7, 2008 Posted August 7, 2008 You guys are attacking a strawman here. There is not meaningfull support for military intervention in Sudan among the withdraw-from-Iraq crowd. If there were then there might be something worth debating. Always thought there was from what I saw. Regardless, of the supporters of Darfur intervention, most of their logic that I've heard is specious at best. The idea that we should "leave Iraq" but go to Darfur, on some misguided principle that Iraq is a "bad" war because we started it, but Sudan is a "good" war because we didn't, is a pretty poor foundation for any sort of sane foreign policy.
John Adams Posted August 7, 2008 Posted August 7, 2008 You guys are attacking a strawman here. There is not meaningfull support for military intervention in Sudan among the withdraw-from-Iraq crowd. If there were then there might be something worth debating. We'd have gone to Sudan if we weren't so overdrawn in Iraq.
/dev/null Posted August 7, 2008 Posted August 7, 2008 Sudan : No Blood for ???? No Blood for George Clooney
Recommended Posts