Gavin in Va Beach Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 Interesting read- http://www.yoest.com/2008/05/20/intelligen...-herbert-meyer/ This is a paper presented several weeks ago by Herb Meyer at a Davos,Switzerland meeting which was attended by most of the CEOs from all the major international corporations — a very good summary of today’s key trends and a perspective one seldom sees. Herbert E. Meyer served during the Reagan Administration as Special Assistant to the Director of Central Intelligence and Vice Chairman of the CIA’s National Intelligence Council. In these positions, he managed production of the U.S. National Intelligence Estimates and other top- secret projections for the President and his national security advisers. Meyer is widely credited with being the first senior U.S.Government official to forecast the Soviet Union’s collapse, for which he later was awarded the U.S.National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal, the intelligence community’s highest honor. [ Meyer is] Formerly an associate editor of FORTUNE, he is also the author of several books. WHAT IN THE WORLD IS GOING ON? A GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING FOR CEOs By HERBERT MEYER FOUR MAJOR TRANSFORMATIONS Currently, there are [4] major transformations that are shaping political, economic and world events. These transformations have profound implications for American business leaders and owners, our culture and on our way of life. 1. The War in Iraq There are three major monotheistic religions in the world: Christianity, Judaism and Islam. In the sixteenth century, Judaism and Christianity reconciled with the modern world. The rabbis, priests and scholars found a way to settle up and pave the way forward. Religion remained at the center of life, church and state became separate. Rule of law, idea of economic liberty, individual rights, human Rights-all these are defining point of modern Western civilization. These concepts started with the Greeks but didn’t take off until the 15th and 16th century when Judaism and Christianity found a way to reconcile with the modern world. When that happened, it unleashed the scientific revolution and the greatest outpouring of art, literature and music the world has ever known. Islam, which developed in the seventh century, counts millions of Moslems around the world who are normal people. However, there is a radical streak within Islam. When the radicals are in charge, Islam attacks Western civilization. Islam first attacked Western civilization in the seventh century, and later in the 16th and 17th centuries. By 1683, the Moslems (Turks from the Ottoman Empire) were literally at the gates of Vienna. It was in Vienna that the climatic battle between Islam and Western civilization took place. The West won and went forward. Islam lost and went backward. Interestingly, the date of that battle was September 11. Since them, Islam has not found a way to reconcile with the modern world. Today, terrorism is the third attack on Western civilization by radical Islam. To deal with terrorism, the U.S. is doing two things. First, units of our armed forces are in thirty countries around the world hunting down terrorist groups and dealing with them. This gets very little publicity. Second we are taking military action in Afghanistan and Iraq. These actions are covered relentlessly by the media. People can argue about whether the war in Iraq is right or wrong. However, the underlying strategy behind the war is to use our military to remove the radicals from power and give the moderates a chance. Our hope is that, over time, the moderates will find a way to bring Islam forward into the 21st century. That’s what our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan is all about. The lesson of 9/11 is that we live in a world where a small number of people can kill a large number of people very quickly. They can use airplanes, bombs, anthrax, chemical weapons or dirty bombs. Even with a first-rate intelligence service (which the U.S. does not have), you can’t stop every attack. That means our tolerance for political horseplay has dropped to zero. No longer will we play games with terrorists or weapons of mass destructions. Most of the instability and horseplay is coming from the Middle East. That’s why we have thought that if we could knock out the radicals and give the moderates a chance to hold power, they might find a way to reconcile Islam with the modern world. So when looking at Afghanistan or Iraq, it’s important to look for any signs that they are modernizing. For example, women being brought into the work force and colleges in Afghanistan is good. The Iraqis stumbling toward a constitution is good. People can argue about what the U.S. is doing and how we’re doing it, but anything that suggests Islam is finding its way forward is good. 2. The emergence of China In the last 20 years, China has moved 250 million people from the farms and villages into the cities. Their plan is to move another 300 million in the next 20 years. When you put that many people into the cities, you have to find work for them. That’s why China is addicted to manufacturing; they have to put all the relocated people to work. When we decide to manufacture something in the U.S., it’s based on market needs and the opportunity to make a profit. In China, they make the decision because they want the jobs, which is a very different calculation. While China is addicted to manufacturing, Americans are addicted to low prices. As a result, a unique kind of economic codependency has developed between the two countries. If we ever stop buying from China, they will explode politically. If China stops selling to us, our economy will take a huge hit because prices will jump. We are subsidizing their economic development; they are subsidizing our economic growth. Because of their huge growth in manufacturing, China is hungry for raw materials, which drives prices up worldwide. China is also thirsty for oil, which is one reason oil is now at one hundred dollars a barrel. By 2020, China will produce more cars than the U.S. China is also buying its way into the oil infrastructure around the world. They are doing it in the open market and paying fair market prices, but millions of barrels of oil that would have gone to the U.S. are now going to China. China’s quest to assure it has the oil it needs to fuel its economy is a major factor in world politics and economics. We have our Navy fleets protecting the sea lines, specifically the ability to get the tankers through. It won’t be long before the Chinese have an aircraft carrier sitting in the Persian Gulf as well. The question is, will their aircraft carrier be pointing in the same direction as ours or against us? 3. Shifting demographics of Western Civilization Most countries in the Western world have stopped breeding. For a civilization obsessed with sex, this is remarkable. Maintaining a steady population requires a birth rate of 2.1 In Western Europe, the birth rate currently stands at 1.5, or 30 percent below replacement. In 30 years there will be 70 to 80 million fewer Europeans than there are today. The current birth rate in Germany is 1.3. Italy and Spain are even lower at 1.2. At that rate, the working age population declines by 30 percent in 20 years, which has a huge impact on the economy. When you don’t have young workers to replace the older ones, you have to import them. The European countries are currently importing Moslems. Today, the Moslems comprise ten percent of France and Germany, and the percentage is rising rapidly because they have higher birthrates. However, the Moslem populations are not being integrated into the cultures of their host countries, which is a political catastrophe. One reason Germany and France don’t support the Iraq war is they fear their Moslem populations will explode on them. By 2020, more than half of all births in the Netherlands will be non-European. The huge design flaw in the postmodern secular state is that you need a traditional religious society birth rate to sustain it. The Europeans simply don’t wish to have children, so they are dying. In Japan, the birthrate is 1.3. As a result, Japan will lose up to 60 million people over the next 30 years. Because Japan has a very different society than Europe, they refuse to import workers. Instead, they are just shutting down. Japan has already closed 2,000 schools, and is closing them down at the rate of 300 per year. Japan is also aging very rapidly. By 2020, one out of every five Japanese will be at least 70 years old. Nobody has any idea about how to run an economy with those demographics. Europe and Japan, which comprise two of the world’s major economic engines, aren’t merely in recession, they’re shutting down. This will have a huge impact on the world economy, and it is already beginning to happen. Why are the birthrates so low? There is a direct correlation between abandonment of traditional religious society and a drop in birth rate, and Christianity in Europe is becoming irrelevant. The second reason is economic. When the birth rate drops below replacement, the population ages. With fewer working people to support more retired people, it puts a crushing tax burden on the smaller group of working age people. As a result, young people delay marriage and having a family. Once this trend starts, the downward spiral only gets worse. These countries have abandoned all the traditions they formerly held in regard to having families and raising children. The U.S. birth rate is 2.0, just below replacement. We have an increase in population because of immigration. When broken down by ethnicity, the Anglo birth rate is 1.6 — same as France — while the Hispanic birth rate is 2.7. In the U.S., the baby boomers are starting to retire in massive numbers. This will push the elder dependency ratio from 19 to 38 over the next 10 to 15 years. This is not as bad as Europe, but still represents the same kind of trend. Western civilization seems to have forgotten what every primitive society understands-you need kids to have a healthy society. Children are huge consumers. Then they grow up to become taxpayers. That’s how a society works, but the postmodern secular state seems to have forgotten that. If U.S. birth rates of the past 20 to 30 years had been the same as post-World War II, there would be no Social Security or Medicare problems. The world’s most effective birth control device is money. As society creates a middle class and women move into the workforce, birth rates drop. Having large families is incompatible with middle class living. The quickest way to drop the birth rate is through rapid economic development. After World War II, the U.S. instituted a $600 tax credit per child. The idea was to enable mom and dad to have four children without being troubled by taxes. This led to a baby boom of 22 million kids, which was a huge consumer market. That turned into a huge tax base. However, to match that incentive in today’s dollars would cost $12,000 per child. China and India do not have declining populations. However, in both countries, there is a preference for boys over girls, and we now have the technology to know which is which before they are born. In China and India, families are aborting the girls. As a result, in each of these countries there are 70 million boys growing up who will never find wives. When left alone, nature produces 103 boys for every 100 girls. In some provinces, however, the ratio is 128 boys to every 100 girls. The birth rate in Russia is so low that by 2050 their population will be smaller than that of Yemen. Russia has one-sixth of the earth’s land surface and much of its oil. You can’t control that much area with such a small population. Immediately to the south, you have China with 70 million unmarried men who are a real potential nightmare scenario for Russia. 4. Restructuring of American Business The fourth major transformation involves a fundamental restructuring of American business. Today’s business environment is very complex and competitive. To succeed, you have to be the best, which means having the highest quality and lowest cost. Whatever your price point, you must have the best quality and lowest price. To be the best, you have to concentrate on one thing. You can’t be all things to all people and be the best. A generation ago, IBM used to make every part of their computer. Now Intel makes the chips, Microsoft makes the software, and someone else makes the modems, hard drives, monitors, etc. IBM even out sources their call center. Because IBM has all these companies supplying goods and services cheaper and better than they could do it themselves, they can make a better computer at a lower cost. This is called a fracturing of business. When one company can make a better product by relying on others to perform functions the business used to do itself, it creates a complex pyramid of companies that serve and support each other. This fracturing of American business is now in its second generation. The companies who supply IBM are now doing the same thing - outsourcing many of their core services and production process. As a result, they can make cheaper, better products. Over time, this pyramid continues to get bigger and bigger. Just when you think it can’t fracture again, it does. Even very small businesses can have a large pyramid of corporate entities that perform many of its important functions. One aspect of this trend is that companies end up with fewer employees and more independent contractors. This trend has also created two new words in business, integrator and complementor. At the top of the pyramid, IBM is the integrator. As you go down the pyramid, Microsoft, Intel and the other companies that support IBM are the complementors. However, each of the complementors is itself an integrator for the complementors underneath it. This has several implications, the first of which is that we are now getting false readings on the economy. People who used to be employees are now independent contractors launching their own businesses. There are many people working whose work is not listed as a job. As a result, the economy is perking along better than the numbers are telling us. Outsourcing also confused the numbers. Suppose a company like General Motors decides to outsource all its employee cafeteria functions to Marriott (which it did). It lays-off hundreds of cafeteria workers, who then get hired right back by Marriott. The only thing that has changed is that these people work for Marriott rather than GM. Yet, the media headlines will scream that America has lost more manufacturing jobs. All that really happened is that these workers are now reclassified as service workers. So the old way of counting jobs contributes to false economic readings. As yet, we haven’t figured out how to make the numbers catch up with the changing realities of the business world. Another implication of this massive restructuring is that because companies are getting rid of units and people that used to work for them, the entity is smaller. As the companies get smaller and more efficient, revenues are going down but profits are going up. As a result, the old notion that revenues are up and we’re doing great isn’t always the case anymore. Companies are getting smaller but are becoming more efficient and profitable in the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 One of my TSW pet peeves is when somebody links an article then proceeds to post the whole thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted July 10, 2008 Author Share Posted July 10, 2008 One of my TSW pet peeves is when somebody links an article then proceeds to post the whole thing Happier now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnzane Posted July 10, 2008 Share Posted July 10, 2008 lengthy but excellent read. I disagree a tad with how american business are restructuring and how they must restructure, but this was a very spot on article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 14, 2008 Share Posted July 14, 2008 China will have an aircraft carrier pointed at us or for us? I doubt that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLflutie7 Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 Interesting read- http://www.yoest.com/2008/05/20/intelligen...-herbert-meyer/ 3. That's is why back in 1999 or 2000, I said putting women in the work force was a huge mistake. To maintain a upper middle class lifestyle, women put off child birth because they want a career and they use birth control. The white population gets richer and has a upper middle class and they start having less children. The white population becomes more rich for a very short period of time. And then it all implodes because there is no young people left to support all the old rich people when they get old. Mexicans are imported because there is not enough young white people left. Like the article said, having kids and having a middle class lifestyle are not compatible. So what you have today is a society with a bunch of uppity white women who are not having children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elegantelliotoffen Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 3. That's is why back in 1999 or 2000, I said putting women in the work force was a huge mistake. To maintain a upper middle class lifestyle, women put off child birth because they want a career and they use birth control. The white population gets richer and has a upper middle class and they start having less children. The white population becomes more rich for a very short period of time. And then it all implodes because there is no young people left to support all the old rich people when they get old. Mexicans are imported because there is not enough young white people left. Like the article said, having kids and having a middle class lifestyle are not compatible. So what you have today is a society with a bunch of uppity white women who are not having children. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy#Synopsis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 Dear Elliot, How do you feel about the heritability of intelligence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 Dear Elliot, How do you feel about the heritability of intelligence? He's again't it. Unless you provide him some links... HTML only, no PDFs, site domain-name registered by godaddy.com, and in triplicate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elegantelliotoffen Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 Dear Elliot, How do you feel about the heritability of intelligence? Maybe it's inherited, maybe it isn't. I don't have an opinion. But....if you forced me to have one I'd say it's probably a combination of genes and environment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 3.5 I think this guy, molson, et al are the same person. They don't seem to have a job except to come on here and spout the DNC talking points of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 3.5 I think this guy, molson, et al are the same person. They don't seem to have a job except to come on here and spout the DNC talking points of the day. You'll never be more correct than this; you should end your posting career on this high note. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 3.5 I think this guy, molson, et al are the same person. They don't seem to have a job except to come on here and spout the DNC talking points of the day. Yep. Mickey, molsen, beausox, steely, hogboy.... there's been a steady stream of virtually the same persona. He creates different user-names so they have the air of being on the board for a while with the join date, then languishes a few of them to pull out when one inevitably gets banned (ever notice how they just roll out in sequence after each ban?) b/c he acts like an a--hole (crusades, posting entire copyrighted texts w/o links or quotes, personal insults among other violations of the Terms of Service). And then just the general 'Do my research for me' and 'I don't care what the facts are; I'm not going to admit I'm wrong, so I'm just going to toy with people.' Tracing the IP addresses would probably confirm some things. It really brings the quality of the boards (PPP, TSW and OTW) down to have to deal with this kind of bs, and puts a lot of crap work onto the mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elegantelliotoffen Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 Yep. Mickey, molsen, beausox, steely, hogboy.... there's been a steady stream of virtually the same persona. He creates different user-names so they have the air of being on the board for a while with the join date, then languishes a few of them to pull out when one inevitably gets banned (ever notice how they just roll out in sequence after each ban?) b/c he acts like an a--hole (crusades, posting entire copyrighted texts w/o links or quotes, personal insults among other violations of the Terms of Service). And then just the general 'Do my research for me' and 'I don't care what the facts are; I'm not going to admit I'm wrong, so I'm just going to toy with people.' Tracing the IP addresses would probably confirm some things. It really brings the quality of the boards (PPP, TSW and OTW) down to have to deal with this kind of bs, and puts a lot of crap work onto the mods. So you're saying that I created this account over 2 years ago in order to skirt the terms of the TOS? Check my IP address please, this is the only account I've ever had here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 So you're saying that I created this account over 2 years ago in order to skirt the terms of the TOS? Check my IP address please, this is the only account I've ever had here. Even if you're using the only account you've ever owned and are not Molson (highly unlikely), you're still polluting the board with your toxicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elegantelliotoffen Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Even if you're using the only account you've ever owned and are not Molson (highly unlikely), you're still polluting the board with your toxicity. Why are you getting so bent out of shape? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Why are you getting so bent out of shape? Because you are, yet again, dragging down a board of generally well-behaved people with your repetitive, obnoxious, childish posts. For the brief periods when you've been on hiatus from this place, it actually felt like a decent board again. But like the cancer you are, you keep coming back, infecting us all. Take your mental problems to another board. You're not wanted or liked here, as has been made clear many times. A person of somewhat normal social skills would understand that and go where he was tolerated. But that's not you. In my entire time posting here--since the mid 90s--I've never seen anyone quite like you. You trump BF, Rich in Ohio, Tenne--you are the leader of the pack of the mentally ill that have occasionally posted here. I'm sure you take pride in that but you should seek help. If only the ignore feature just wiped your name off the entire board for me. Ahh, I can dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elegantelliotoffen Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Because you are, yet again, dragging down a board of generally well-behaved people with your repetitive, obnoxious, childish posts. For the brief periods when you've been on hiatus from this place, it actually felt like a decent board again. But like the cancer you are, you keep coming back, infecting us all. Typical right wing response- I don't like what you're saying so I want you silenced. If only the ignore feature just wiped your name off the entire board for me. Ahh, I can dream. Why don't you ignore me then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnzane Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Even if you're using the only account you've ever owned and are not Molson (highly unlikely), you're still polluting the board with your toxicity. Pot meeting kettle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Typical right wing response- I don't like what you're saying so I want you silenced. He's actually pretty far left, dumbass. If you weren't so caught up with yourself, you might actually perceive that it's not your politics he dislikes, it's you personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts