BeastMode54 Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 Erie County District Attorney Frank J. Clark announced today that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch has agreed to a deal that will resolve the investigation of his hit-and-run accident. "This whole agreement is predicated on the fact that he was driving the car," Clark said. "Has he said that officially? The answer is no. But obviously, the reason we were here in these negotiations is all predicated on the fact that he was driving the vehicle." Presumably, this means Lynch will plead guilty to some traffic offense related to leaving the scene of an accident, but Clark wouldn't get specific during his bizarre press conference, in which he got angry at reporters when they asked him what the agreement entailed. Clark did say there was one other person in the SUV when Lynch hit a pedestrian, but he would not say whether that passenger was a Buffalo Bills player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBilliever Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 Steve Johnson was supoened due to the fact he's good friends with Marshawn. Hardy... well because he's Hardy. Christian Gaddis? I got nothin' here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMode54 Posted June 20, 2008 Author Share Posted June 20, 2008 I don't get it. Were they in the area with him. Steve Johnson has dreads too, so was it profiling? And Hardy, because of his previous issues? I just don;t get it. I'm baffled by Gaddis too, unless it was actually him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 Erie County District Attorney Frank J. Clark announced today that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch has agreed to a deal that will resolve the investigation of his hit-and-run accident. "This whole agreement is predicated on the fact that he was driving the car," Clark said. "Has he said that officially? The answer is no. But obviously, the reason we were here in these negotiations is all predicated on the fact that he was driving the vehicle." Presumably, this means Lynch will plead guilty to some traffic offense related to leaving the scene of an accident, but Clark wouldn't get specific during his bizarre press conference, in which he got angry at reporters when they asked him what the agreement entailed. Clark did say there was one other person in the SUV when Lynch hit a pedestrian, but he would not say whether that passenger was a Buffalo Bills player. You really should read through other threads before starting new threads asking questions like this, because they have been answered before. In short, however, the subpoenas never meant that those players or members of the organization were with Lynch that night. Ralph, for example, was only threatened to be subpoenaed because when Clark was at OBD he SAW Ralph talking with Lynch. The DA just assumed they were talking about the case, and he figured that if he got anyone in front of a grand jury they would be compelled to say what they know, including what Lynch may have told them in confidence. Hardy, for example, was going to be subpoenaed because Lynch was at Hardy's apartment 6-7 hours before the incident, with other Bills players. Since the Bills players weren't talking, Clark thought maybe he could get a list of which guys left the apartment with Lynch earlier that night. Hardy didn't even go out with them on Chippewa. Johnson and Gaddis could have been seen talking to Lynch, could have been at Hardy's, or eyewitnesses could have seen them together with Lynch in a bar on Chippewa, but that doesn't mean they came or left with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMode54 Posted June 20, 2008 Author Share Posted June 20, 2008 You really should read through other threads before starting new threads asking questions like this, because they have been answered before. In short, however, the subpoenas never meant that those players or members of the organization were with Lynch that night. Ralph, for example, was only threatened to be subpoenaed because when Clark was at OBD he SAW Ralph talking with Lynch. The DA just assumed they were talking about the case, and he figured that if he got anyone in front of a grand jury they would be compelled to say what they know, including what Lynch may have told them in confidence. Hardy, for example, was going to be subpoenaed because Lynch was at Hardy's apartment 6-7 hours before the incident, with other Bills players. Since the Bills players weren't talking, Clark thought maybe he could get a list of which guys left the apartment with Lynch earlier that night. Hardy didn't even go out with them on Chippewa. Johnson and Gaddis could have been seen talking to Lynch, could have been at Hardy's, or eyewitnesses could have seen them together with Lynch in a bar on Chippewa, but that doesn't mean they came or left with him. got it, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 [This is an automated response] This subject matter is being currently being discussed or has already been discussed in a previous thread. Please consider using the "search" function before starting new topics. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts