#89 Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 We kick the ball and the Miami player is clearly out of bounds and touches the ball the ball goes to Miami on the 40 Miami ball. They kick the ball goes out of bounds on the 6 yd line. We get the ball on the 6
Ramius Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 here ya go #89... http://205.134.161.85/forums/index.php?showtopic=6663
stevestojan Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 We kick the ball and the Miami player is clearly out of bounds and touches the ball the ball goes to Miami on the 40 Miami ball. They kick the ball goes out of bounds on the 6 yd line. We get the ball on the 6 73998[/snapback] it is a rule. A messed up one when your on the receiving end, but it is a rule. T-minus 11 weeks until the NFL changes it One thing i must admit, it was a head's up play by the returner.
RunTheBall Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 Their kick that went out of bounds was a punt. Our kick that the guy touched while he was out of bounds was a kick off and a smart legal play on his part. RunTheBall
Bear Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 it is a rule. A messed up one when your on the receiving end, but it is a rule. T-minus 11 weeks until the NFL changes it One thing i must admit, it was a head's up play by the returner. 74003[/snapback] I agree this rule will probably be changed. It's happened twice now in two weeks, and it just doesn't make any sense. Why is it illegal for a person to be the first one to touch a ball after going out of bounds, but when you actually touch a ball when you are out of bounds it benefits your team? At least hit happened last week. There was a point of reference that he refs made the correct call.
Recommended Posts