MichFan Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/News/story?id=174461&page=1 Really no surprise when you look at the people on this board. The libs are so busy hating Bush and worrying about another 4 years how could they find the time? I think ABC was a little too PC on explaining the results, though. They left out the gay male demographic in the Democrat party, and who could be satisfied on the receiving end of that relationship?
PastaJoe Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 Probably because Democrats are too tired from working the two jobs they had to take to replace the one that got outsourced. The poll analysis also reveals who has worn something sexy to enhance their sex life:Republicans — 72 percent; Democrats — 62 percent Who knew that Marv Albert was a Republican.
ubhockey Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 Probably because Democrats are too tired from working the two jobs they had to take to replace the one that got outsourced.Who knew that Marv Albert was a Republican. 74606[/snapback] YOU MEAN ... Probably because Democrats are too tired from working the two jobs they had to take to replace the one that got outsourced to a one legged, 10 year old in some third world country because the stupid lib thought doing his easy ass job at a ridiculously high wage would last forever.
erynthered Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 Probably because Democrats are too tired from working the two jobs they had to take to replace the one that got outsourced. See, who say's we're not compassionate. Thats allot of hard work taking care of all those Democrats wives.
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/News/story?id=174461&page=1 Really no surprise when you look at the people on this board. The libs are so busy hating Bush and worrying about another 4 years how could they find the time? I think ABC was a little too PC on explaining the results, though. They left out the gay male demographic in the Democrat party, and who could be satisfied on the receiving end of that relationship? 73996[/snapback] Actually, all those threads where you're wondering where the liberals are... well, you do the math. Or perhaps we're too busy getting busy to bother answering a poll about it
spidey Posted October 18, 2004 Posted October 18, 2004 YOU MEAN ... Probably because Democrats are too tired from working the two jobs they had to take to replace the one that got outsourced to a one legged, 10 year old in some third world country because the stupid lib thought doing his easy ass job at a ridiculously high wage would last forever. 74670[/snapback] So speaks a compassionate conservative
ExiledInIllinois Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Poof! Where did you go? Hey... I protest... Come on... The banter wasn't that bad!
Mike in Syracuse Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Dude, Did you see the guys at the Republican convention? There is no way they're getting more p*ssy then the Democrats. Did you ever consider that maybe the Republicans are wearing more sexy things because they're butt-ugly? It's just a theory but I'm willing to go with it.
spidey Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Did you see the guys at the Republican convention? There is no way they're getting more p*ssy then the Democrats. 75274[/snapback] Hey who said anything about p*ssy, they just said they were having more sex
KD in CA Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Did you see the guys at the Republican convention? There is no way they're getting more p*ssy then the Democrats. No, but I saw the p*ssy at the Republican convension. A far sight better than the bitter-shrew type that was so common at the Dems gathering!
DC Tom Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 See, who say's we're not compassionate. Thats allot of hard work taking care of all those Democrats wives. 74671[/snapback] Democratic wives...like Hillary Clinton?
ubhockey Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Democratic wives...like Hillary Clinton? 75548[/snapback] Very constructive thread. Haha. But I'd surely tap Laura Bush before Hilary Clinton and definately tap either of the Bush daughters before Chelsea.
erynthered Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Democratic wives...like Hillary Clinton? 75548[/snapback] There are exceptions to every rule.............
SD Jarhead Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 C'mon guys...this should be an easy one. It's no wonder Republicans have better sex...those hippie Dim chicks like NozzleNUT don't shave their legs or pits. Who want to sleep with a cavechick?
Alaska Darin Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 C'mon guys...this should be an easy one. It's no wonder Republicans have better sex...those hippie Dim chicks like NozzleNUT don't shave their legs or pits. Who want to sleep with a cavechick? 75916[/snapback] Apparently Bill Clinton.
PastaJoe Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Or Mary Cheney. Oooh, I'm a bad man, I told the truth! We can't let anyone know about that! That's a family secret, which is why she's not allowed on stage with her life partner with the rest of the family. Don't remind those Bush supporters that think gays are an abomination know there's one in the VP's family, they can't handle hypocracy.
Evil Bastard Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Or Mary Cheney. Oooh, I'm a bad man, I told the truth! We can't let anyone know about that! That's a family secret, which is why she's not allowed on stage with her life partner with the rest of the family. Don't remind those Bush supporters that think gays are an abomination know there's one in the VP's family, they can't handle hypocracy. 75940[/snapback] Yup, all Republicans need to be in lockstep on every issue. I am not shocked that liberals do not understand the concept of "thinking for yourselves."
PastaJoe Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Did I say ALL Republicans? I said THOSE Bush supporters that think gays are an abomination. You know they're out there, and that's why Bush/Cheney don't want to give Mary Cheney any exposure as opposed to the rest of their "Americana" family.
Alaska Darin Posted October 19, 2004 Posted October 19, 2004 Did I say ALL Republicans? I said THOSE Bush supporters that think gays are an abomination. You know they're out there, and that's why Bush/Cheney don't want to give Mary Cheney any exposure as opposed to the rest of their "Americana" family. 75951[/snapback] I'm sure there aren't any John Kerry supporters who think gays are an abomination. It can't be that his daughter doesn't want to be used as a pawn in a political shell game. Nah, has to be a bigger conspiracy than that, since it fits your simpleton political view.
Recommended Posts