Mikie2times Posted June 18, 2008 Author Posted June 18, 2008 Embark on a crusade to make them illegal nationwide. Save me please. Since your State will will have to replace that heavy sin tax, proudly pay that extra 400 bucks per year in State income tax to make up the shortfall. Sign your tax return with a breath of fresh air! Nice...
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Embark on a crusade to make them illegal nationwide. Save me please. Since your State will will have to replace that heavy sin tax, proudly pay that extra 400 bucks per year in State income tax to make up the shortfall. Sign your tax return with a breath of fresh air! I don't care if you smoke just do it at home. You can leave the house for a few hours and not have a smoke, baby.
Chilly Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 What's that? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_site#Lemonparty.org
OCinBuffalo Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 The whole "fixed it for ya" internet meme is the gayest sh-- ever. You probably say LMAO and love to pwn n00bz right? No, and I also don't act like a tool when somebody points out a set of rational points. Still waiting on you for anything that even approaches a rational counter to any of my points.
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_site#Lemonparty.org A while ago I click on one of those shock sites and I saw something gross but I looked away fast enough not to be able to really tell what it was, might of been some guys !@#$ or something.
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 No, and I also don't act like a tool when somebody points out a set of rational points. Still waiting on you for anything that even approaches a rational counter to any of my points. IM ALSO A BIGTIME HOMO! FIXED IT FOR YA!
Lv-Bills Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 I get mighty slippery when I am in proper attire and wielding my specialty gripped 50's era 2 iron. lol, I hear ya, but hopefully you're drunk enough to swing and miss once, so the beatdown could then occur. Nothing like fighting a drunk. Well, nothing easier of course.
OCinBuffalo Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 FIXED IT FOR YA! Case in point. Tool behavior once again. Tell me you aren't this stupid, please.
Chilly Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Case in point. Tool behavior once again. Tell me you aren't this stupid, please. You haven't figured out he's trolling yet? lol
stuckincincy Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 I don't care if you smoke just do it at home. You can leave the house for a few hours and not have a smoke, baby. And you've no reason to patronize businesses where smoking occurs, either. Unless you believe that owners of private property should have their rights snuffed out by the State. You were born too late - Communist Russia was your ticket.
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 And you've no reason to patronize businesses where smoking occurs, either. Unless you believe that owners of private property should have their rights snuffed out by the State. You were born too late - Communist Russia was your ticket. Wrong again you're free to do whatever you want as long as it doesn't infringe on someone elses freedom.
DC Tom Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 I can't believe the lengths people on here will go to rationalize Lynch's behavior. Exactly what behavior are we talking about here?
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Exactly what behavior are we talking about here? Hitting a woman with his SUV and then leaving the scene.
stuckincincy Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Wrong again you're free to do whatever you want as long as it doesn't infringe on someone elses freedom. Does that include the freedom of a business owner to allow smoking on the property he owns? Don't his patrons have the freedom to smoke? Is your freedom not to be around smoke superior to their freedom to smoke? Do you want to infringe on a smoker's freedom?
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Does that include the freedom of a business owner to allow smoking on the property he owns? Don't his patrons have the freedom to smoke? Is your freedom not to be around smoke superior to their freedom to smoke? Do you want to infringe on a smoker's freedom? Then why hasn't the Supreme Court ruled smoking bans unconstitutional? You smokers are such crybabies. Waaaaaa I can't go 2 hours without a smoke Waaaaaa!!!!! It's not my fault you're such a geek you need a smoke hanging out your mouth to look cool.
Heels20X6 Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Then why hasn't the Supreme Court ruled smoking bans unconstitutional? You smokers are such crybabies. Waaaaaa I can't go 2 hours without a smoke Waaaaaa!!!!! It's not my fault you're such a geek you need a smoke hanging out your mouth to look cool. Some people choose to smoke cigarettes, some choose to smoke pole....I think it's pretty obvious you prefer the latter.
apuszczalowski Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Then why hasn't the Supreme Court ruled smoking bans unconstitutional? You smokers are such crybabies. Waaaaaa I can't go 2 hours without a smoke Waaaaaa!!!!! It's not my fault you're such a geek you need a smoke hanging out your mouth to look cool. By banning smoking, aren't you infringing on smokers freedom to smoke then?
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 By banning smoking, aren't you infringing on smokers freedom to smoke then? So exactly where in the Constitution does it say that that you have the right to smoke anywhere?
ExiledInIllinois Posted June 20, 2008 Posted June 20, 2008 By banning smoking, aren't you infringing on smokers freedom to smoke then? Here goes... I am jumping in the fray. To answer your question: No. The only thing you are infringing on is the smoker's freedom to harm other people or cause a public safety issue. Those two important issues outweigh the freedom to smoke at will. You are basically banned from smoking at gas pumps, movie theaters, in the stands at the sport's stadiums, or heck when a boat comes through where I work. Where is the out cry about that? Again, I don't mind if one smokes... But, why not treat it as a public health and safety issue, which IMO it is.
elegantelliotoffen Posted June 20, 2008 Posted June 20, 2008 Here goes... I am jumping in the fray. To answer your question: No. The only thing you are infringing on is the smoker's freedom to harm other people or cause a public safety issue. Those two important issues outweigh the freedom to smoke at will. You are basically banned from smoking at gas pumps, movie theaters, in the stands at the sport's stadiums, or heck when a boat comes through where I work. Where is the out cry about that? Again, I don't mind if one smokes... But, why not treat it as a public health and safety issue, which IMO it is. He's right, unless an amendment is made to the Constitution man has no god given freedom to smoke. In fact not only may a State restrict smoking in areas where it would be a health hazard they could (if they really wanted to) outlaw cigarettes completely (which I know would never happen).
.thumb.png.1b7fb4086290c3afc001a7900b31fab0.png)
Recommended Posts