SD Jarhead Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 BF-It's pointless...Molten,er, EZA won't let facts get in the way of his conjecture... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 SD: If you were unaware of the news cycle, it is not my invention that Kozinski was forced to recuse himself from the case and declare a mistrial because of his fetish-porn site scandal. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew...0,4396754.story The next step will be the launching of proceedings to determine what disciplinary action can and will be taken against him under the Judicial Conduct Act as well as violations of the Code of Conduct canon for federal judges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 SD: If you were unaware of the news cycle, it is not my invention that Kozinski was forced to recuse himself from the case and declare a mistrial because of his fetish-porn site scandal. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew...0,4396754.story The next step will be the launching of proceedings to determine what disciplinary action can and will be taken against him under the Judicial Conduct Act as well as violations of the Code of Conduct canon for federal judges. He never had a porn site. It was a private folder of pics on his family's home server that wasn't password protected. And a lot of the content described by the LA Times article was exaggerated or outright lies. This link is an Op Ed piece written by a public defender and discusses hypothetical outcomes based on the accuracy (or lack thereof) of the original article. But nice try.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 "Faking", I applaud your tenacity on standing behind what you have faith in, which I have no doubt makes you a very good and true Bills fan. However, while the article did include discussion points, it is not hypothetical that Kozinski was forced to recuse over his porn site, it is not hypothetical that he is most certainly going to be facing investigations for violation of the Code of Conduct and the Judical Conduct Act, and it is not hypothetical that if it is found he contributed to his porn site while at the office he will face serious disclipinary action. I am only stating the facts, as irate as that may make some of the more passionate 1st Ammendment Rights activists frequenting this message board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 "Faking", I applaud your tenacity on standing behind what you have faith in, which I have no doubt makes you a very good and true Bills fan. However, while the article did include discussion points, it is not hypothetical that Kozinski was forced to recuse over his porn site, it is not hypothetical that he is most certainly going to be facing investigations for violation of the Code of Conduct and the Judical Conduct Act, and it is not hypothetical that if it is found he contributed to his porn site while at the office he will face serious disclipinary action. I am only stating the facts, as irate as that may make some of the more passionate 1st Ammendment Rights activists frequenting this message board. with respect to AD, Uhm no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted June 17, 2008 Author Share Posted June 17, 2008 It was too much to hope that Molson's toxicity wouldn't settle elewhere. Please...go away. You're not wanted or welcome here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 It was too much to hope that Molson's toxicity wouldn't settle elewhere. Please...go away. You're not wanted or welcome here. A bit totalitarian of you, no? I have accurately reported what has happened to the judge, you want it to be different, and then declare that I must leave the message boards. It seems you don't care for those who don't fall in lock-step. BTW, who is this Molson? I am assuming he had the temerity to disagree with you and you subsequently drove him out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 A bit totalitarian of you, no? I have accurately reported what has happened to the judge, you want it to be different, and then declare that I must leave the message boards. It seems you don't care for those who don't fall in lock-step. BTW, who is this Molson? I am assuming he had the temerity to disagree with you and you subsequently drove him out? you and accurately are mutually exclusive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 you and accurately are mutually exclusive Are you denying that he was forced to recuse himself from the bench and declare a mistrial over the beastiality case he was presiding over because of this porn scandal, or that he will be facing an investigation into the nature of his involvement in operating a pornsite of his own in violation of the Judicial Conduct Act, or are you flat denying both? You realize you and your friend John Adams are only making yourselves look foolish by rejecting reality, right? Link: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h3YrphW...5pBkOQD91BFRP80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Are you denying that he was forced to recuse himself from the bench and declare a mistrial over the beastiality trial he was presiding over because of this porn scandal, or that he will be facing an investigation into the nature of his involvement in operating a pornsite of his own in violation of the Judicial Conduct Act, or are you flat denying both? You realize you and your friend John Adams are only making yourselves look foolish by rejecting reality, right? Link: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h3YrphW...5pBkOQD91BFRP80 One more time... HE NEVER OPERATED A PORNSITE, it was a folder on his own family's server that wasn't password protected. According to the attorney for the defendant in the bestiality trial, he was intimidated by the Justice Dept, so until the independent investigation of his conduct is completed, he's innocent until proven guilty, much less charged with a crime. You throw unsubstantiated garbage around and then step in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 One more time... HE NEVER OPERATED A PORNSITE, it was a folder on his own family's server that wasn't password protected. According to the attorney for the defendant in the bestiality trial, he was intimidated by the Justice Dept, so until the independent investigation of his conduct is completed, he's innocent until proven guilty, much less charged with a crime. You throw unsubstantiated garbage around and then step in it. Teehee...you have already tried the case in your own mind and have declared a verdict! Fascinating. You realize that the investigation and recusal didn't happen for no reason, and that if it were as purely innocent as you believe than none of this would be taking place, right? Or are you smarter and more "in the know" than the justices who have determined there is substancial enough cause for a full investigation into his conduct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted June 17, 2008 Author Share Posted June 17, 2008 A bit totalitarian of you, no? I have accurately reported what has happened to the judge, you want it to be different, and then declare that I must leave the message boards. It seems you don't care for those who don't fall in lock-step. BTW, who is this Molson? I am assuming he had the temerity to disagree with you and you subsequently drove him out? Plenty of people have disagreed with me and I could care less. Some are even friends. The truth is that few people have done more to drag this community down than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Plenty of people have disagreed with me and I could care less. Some are even friends. The truth is that few people have done more to drag this community down than you. Really...so in my dozen or so comments I've taken this community down more than anyone in history, eh? You need serious help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastback Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Stop feeding the trolls and they'll go away (eventually). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 Let's put another epitaph on this non-story. Bravo, journalists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 The reporter and/or editor who made the decision to hold off on this should be fired. Oh, and my bet is on Blubber Boy (The Whale), not Molson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts