Kelly the Dog Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Would he have any trouble with getting women to vote for him? No. He may not even be having any more trouble than his opponents with the under-educated, except in the places he did terribly in like West Virginia where they didn't even know who he was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 It woulda been fun to see Obama versus Dean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastback Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted June 5, 2008 Author Share Posted June 5, 2008 If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle... No, she'd be a mutant hideous transsexual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastback Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 You wouldn't say that if you saw her moustache... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 Would he have any trouble with getting women to vote for him? No. He may not even be having any more trouble than his opponents with the under-educated, except in the places he did terribly in like West Virginia where they didn't even know who he was. so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted June 5, 2008 Author Share Posted June 5, 2008 so? So when people argue or show stats that say he got 25% of the women vote against Hillary maybe it was 80% to do with Hillary the woman appealing to women and 20% to do with his own problems with getting women to vote for him. And therefore, may not have that problem when compared to, say, his male opponent in the election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 So when people argue or show stats that say he got 25% of the women vote against Hillary maybe it was 80% to do with Hillary the woman appealing to women and 20% to do with his own problems with getting women to vote for him. And therefore, may not have that problem when compared to, say, his male opponent in the election. Ah, I thought you were complaining that Barack would have the base wrapped up if he didn't have to face a woman. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted June 6, 2008 Share Posted June 6, 2008 So when people argue or show stats that say he got 25% of the women vote against Hillary maybe it was 80% to do with Hillary the woman appealing to women and 20% to do with his own problems with getting women to vote for him. And therefore, may not have that problem when compared to, say, his male opponent in the election. All that matters now is can he get the 30% of women who say they won't vote for him now, back on his side? I'd say he's got about a 50/50 shot at that, depends on how well his campaign does speaking to women's issues. Or, I suppose he could go on Oprah every week from here on in. Maybe hang around the spas and discuss aroma therapy, or just buy a sh!tload of chocolate and mail/hand it out. Hell, then he can say he is stimulating the economy in PA, especially Hershey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.529869a0a9afd197241cad0932282c97.jpg)
Recommended Posts