Jump to content

Bills' Picks Are Growing On Me!


Which Round Do You Disagree With Most?  

34 members have voted

  1. 1. In Which RD Do You Like a later-selected player more?

    • Round 1
      1
    • Round 2
      5
    • Round 3
      8
    • Round 4A
      10
    • Round 4B
      0
    • Round 5
      0
    • Round 6
      1
    • Round 7
      1
    • I Like All The Bills' Choices Better
      8


Recommended Posts

In Round 1, I like McKelvin better than the next 3 picks ( Clady, Ryan OT / Stewart, Jonathan RB / Williams, Chris OT).

In Round 2, I like Hardy better than the next 3 picks ( Royal, Eddie WR / Johnson, Tyrell FS/ Forte, Matt RB).

In Round 3, I like Chris Ellis better than the next 3 picks (Charles, Jamaal RB / Connor, Dan OLB / Smith, Reggie DB).

In Round 4, I like Reggie Corner better than the next 3 picks (Moore, Dre DT /Iwebema, Kenny DE / Demps, Quintin FS),

In Round 4, I like Derek Fine better than the next 3 picks ( Hale, David OT /Keglar, Stanford OLB / Sitton, Josh OT).

In Round 5, I like Alvin Bowen better than the next 3 picks (Powell, Carlton DT /Hightower, Tim RB /Giacomini, Breno OT ).

In Round 6, I like Xavier Omon better than the next 3 picks (Moore, Kareem DB /Hayden, Nick DT /Robinson, Kevin WR ).

 

RD7:

Demetrius Bell looks like a better pick than Barrett, Josh S/ Taylor, Hilee OLB / Adams, Chester OG

Steve Johnson looks like a better pick than Keith, Brandon OT /Schilens, Chaz WR /Hillis, Peyton FB

And who knows whether Kennard Cox is a better pick than Mr. Irrelevant?

 

I'd vote that I like all the Bills' picks better. I know some of you would probably choose Connor or Smith over Ellis in Round 3, and I know local boy Brandon Albert might have been a good choice in Round 1. Perhaps you'd choose Dre Moore over Corner in Round 4 (although the Bills must have considered Moore less value than existing DT's).

 

Now that you've had some time for the Bills' picks to soak in, where would you have picked differently given the subsequent picks made by other clubs?

Its nitpicking as no one besides the OBD crowd whether there were any serious offers, but as long as we are asking woulda/coulda/shoulda abstract questions, my preference still would have been for the Bills to trade down the #1 pick if at all possible for additional choices which MAY have allowed us to pick 2 top ranked WRs.

 

I think reality has already shown us that having Hardy as a make or break #2 WR starter is a dangerous thing based on accusations of behavioral issues. The situation was already dicey depending on our #2 WR to be injury free or we are forced to go with an inadequate player at #2 WR.

 

This already is a situation where based on virtually all the performances of rookie WRs Hardy will be doing well to even produce Peerless 07 numbers next year.

 

No one can reasonably fault the Bills as none of outsiders have any idea what potential deals were offered. However, in addition to this question requiring a departure from reality, there is what I think is a real fact that the Bills sent ot McKelvin pick to the front desk with time left on the clock for them to receive offers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...