Willis990 Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Getting signals didn't help Bledsoe out at all. Drew 's record was 5-13 (including the game he got hurt) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Toboggan M.D Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Drew wasn't just bad at quarterback. He stunk at cheating too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stl Bills Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Getting signals didn't help Bledsoe out at all. Drew 's record was 5-13 (including the game he got hurt) Nobody cares Choad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis990 Posted May 16, 2008 Author Share Posted May 16, 2008 Nobody cares Choad. You don't care because it doesn't help frame the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billadelphia Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 You don't care because it doesn't help frame the argument. What about Tom Brady? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyJay1234 Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Getting signals didn't help Bledsoe out at all. Drew 's record was 5-13 (including the game he got hurt) Here is what I simply dont get.... We trade for Drew... Sign Lawyer... And yet somehow our signals still get stolen. At any point does a former player say to his new team.. Hey guys... When I played for the PATS we had cameras and employees whose sole purpose was to steal your signals... Just spitballing here. But WE Might want to cover them up or mix them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 You don't care because it doesn't help frame the argument. Which argument is that you ignorant piece of troll dung? Your team* cheated. Repeatedly*. They got better at it* as they went along. Is your point* that brady* is a better cheater* than Bledsoe? OK. We'll give you that one*. You are positively brilliant in your stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billadelphia Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Which argument is that you ignorant piece of troll dung? Your team cheated. Repeatedly. They got better at it as they went along. Is your point that brady is a better cheater than Bledsoe? OK. We'll give you that one. You are positively brilliant in your stupidity. Exactly. They cut Bledsoe because he couldn't cheat as well as Brady. Next topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Getting signals didn't help Bledsoe out at all. Drew 's record was 5-13 (including the game he got hurt) Did I mention that you are friggin brilliant in your stupidity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Sure they helped. He would have been 0-18 without them. Those Cheatriot teams were really bad before 2001. Better talent, refined cheating methodology and VOILA!!! 3 time SB champs. Just like that. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Toboggan M.D Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Cheating of that magnitude takes a learning curve too. Bledsoe was annihilated by Mo Lewis before he was given the chance to finish learning how to cheat. Drew did lead the big comeback win against the Steelers that year when Brady stubbed his toe and couldn't finish the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis990 Posted May 16, 2008 Author Share Posted May 16, 2008 Sure they helped. He would have been 0-18 without them. Those Cheatriot teams were really bad before 2001. Better talent, refined cheating methodology and VOILA!!! 3 time SB champs. Just like that. GO BILLS!!! 94 views and 9 responses to the troll. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stl Bills Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 94 views and 9 responses to the troll. Thank you. I think fag is more accurate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 94 views and 9 responses to the troll. Thank you. You've just figured out how brilliantly stupid your statement is haven't you? If not, perhaps you could explain yourself a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 94 views and 9 responses to the troll. Thank you. Sportin' wood, yet? Creepy, troll. Creepy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 So if you try to shoot somebody, and miss, then you didn't do anything wrong? This is bigger than the Black Sox scandal, and you can deny it all you want. This goes higher than Bellicheat as well- it goes all the way to the top of the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Here is what I simply dont get.... We trade for Drew... Sign Lawyer... And yet somehow our signals still get stolen. At any point does a former player say to his new team.. Hey guys... When I played for the PATS we had cameras and employees whose sole purpose was to steal your signals... Just spitballing here. But WE Might want to cover them up or mix them up. Good point ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyJay1234 Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 So if you try to shoot somebody, and miss, then you didn't do anything wrong? This is bigger than the Black Sox scandal, and you can deny it all you want. This goes higher than Bellicheat as well- it goes all the way to the top of the NFL. First off. I hate the Patriots... but.... It is not bigger than the Black Sox scandal.... The Sox intentionally lost the World Series for gamblers. The Pats stole signals... How is this different than what goes on in Baseball? Teams always try to steal signals in baseball. The difference with the Pats is that they videotaped... This is where they cheated and the main area of where the Patriots were wrong but lets not get carried away..... Throwing a game intentionally is a little different. Listen. Again..... I have to ask with the number of players/coaches from the Pats that moved on to different teams how did teams not know this and adjust... Film is watched over and over to the point where signals or not teams pretty much know what is coming. Football is a game of execution... How was the fact that the Pats were doing this NOT common knowledge throughout the league..... Football is a game of adjustment as well. How is it that a Coordinator did not use this to their advantage... If I were the OC here is what would go through my mind.... I will show the sign for a screen and run, the sign for a run and do a little play action and go long??? You want to try and cheat.. Cool.. I am going to F with you all day long and make you my bitches... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 I seem to remember Bledsoe replacing an injured Brady* in a PLAYOFF game before the 1st Super Bowl they won*, I think it was the AFC Championship, Bledsoe pulled out the win* for the Pats* so yeah the CHEATING also helped Drew*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 The one thing Bledsoe has is intregrity... Got to hand it to him... He was also told to pick a specific end-zone as Bill in a very critical game against PITT... He picked the other end-zone to defend on that coin toss. Probably never listened to that cheat BB* and the Pats* organization... Moe Lewis did the cheaters all a big favor becuase then they had the guy without intregrity (Tommy Boy) in there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts