John Adams Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 You are damn right its a threat you stupid POS. You attack me and you can expect the same back. Are you a little girl or something? Let's see. You didn't like this guy's post for whatever reason, even though others had been discussing it. So you told him so, then you tossed in an attack about me out of no where. And now you are crying that your p*ssy is soar because I fight back? Now you want to organize some crusade against me because you picked a fight with me and now feel threatened? What a f**ken idiot you are. Go to hell you loser. How's that for "volume abuse?" This particular post by you is not actually volume abuse. Your abortion thread is more in the volume abuse category: adds little except post count. I saw Stuckincincy's post as being in a similar vein--adding little except a post count--it happens that you're the poster boy for that behavior. In general, he's not. To characterize your post, I'd say it's in the personal attack, hostility, and threatening vein. And though I've been the subject of such attacks by better men then you, I haven't ever bothered to point out that they violate the Terms of Service. You, however, are a special case, as your contribution to lowering the common denominator on this board is epic. I see Sketch has contributed to this thread--no doubt in support of my unsuccessful attempt to curb him from following in your footsteps. If I choose to read his post, I'm sure to be enlightened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 For once, he may have a point. Besides the one on his head. Is there a rule in the ToS against "insufferable self-important super serial blowhardness"? Because I think Adams has rewritten that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 Is there a rule in the ToS against "insufferable self-important super serial blowhardness"? Because I think Adams has rewritten that one. Actually, it's encouraged. As is "pedantic supercilious anal orifice"-ness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 Actually, it's encouraged. As is "pedantic supercilious anal orifice"-ness. Admit it: you're jealous that he thought of me for that description and not you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 Admit it: you're jealous that he thought of me for that description and not you. I'm jealous I'm not you! Want to start a thread and have posting sex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 I'm jealous I'm not you! Want to start a thread and have posting sex? Only if you're inviting the pony. Screw it, time to end this thread. Invite Hitler, too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 Only if you're inviting the pony. Screw it, time to end this thread. Invite Hitler, too... Pinkie is in seclusion right now. I know, she's a great addition to any posting sex, but c'est la vie, n'est-ce pas? Eva Braun's cool. I personally don't like the way Hitler's mustache scratches. But Adams may dig that, not sure. Oh wait.... we're just talking about posting sex..... never mind. Everyone is invited! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 This particular post by you is not actually volume abuse. Your abortion thread is more in the volume abuse category: adds little except post count. I saw Stuckincincy's post as being in a similar vein--adding little except a post count--it happens that you're the poster boy for that behavior. In general, he's not. To characterize your post, I'd say it's in the personal attack, hostility, and threatening vein. And though I've been the subject of such attacks by better men then you, I haven't ever bothered to point out that they violate the Terms of Service. You, however, are a special case, as your contribution to lowering the common denominator on this board is epic. I am LMFAO!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 I am LMFAO!!! Adams is all CLASSIC GOLD. He's just shoots the CLASSIC GOLD out of every orifice! I don't know how he does it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 <opens the lid to peek in, it clearly doesn't pass the nose test> Hey everybody, what is this thing in the fridge? <closes lid, puts back in fridge> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 I am LMFAO!!! Felt like that was aimed at you did you? You have the best anti-John Adams rant ever. Not a soul here will ever sniff the genius of that one post. Sadly, I think the historical archives have lost it, but I still have it in an email I sent to a friend. Congrats! You are the biggest douchebag that I have ever seen on TBD, and you have earned this award against some tough competition. You are the first person in all of my years here to ever make my ignore list. Before I write your sorry, confused ass off, I will tell you that your posts are rather generic and really add nothing to this board. Your gay crusade on PPP, while obviously heartfelt, was boring and stirred little response. You are a cowardly little weasel, and obviously confused about your own identity. Work things out Big Guy! laugh.gif If you would be kind enough to post your other screen names, I will happily block them too. Your problems are many and deep. Believe it or not, I hope that you can sift through them and acquire some sort of life. Well, I mean that at least as much as I can. I want to feel this way. In any event, go suck another rooster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 There are many great ideas for saving social security. I have as much or more respect for old people than anyone, but let's face it, their buying habits aren't exactly diverse. If you get the government to initiate a mass purchase of gift certificates to restaurants with early bird specials, nickels for slot machines, and cat food at the grocery store, they could probably get a 50% discount based on volume. We have all read that these items represent roughly 73.6% of old people's purchases. At a 50% discount the government would save exactly 36.8% of the budget without even having to do anything. The old people would probably even feel like they are getting a better deal because they typically don't tip on the full amount, only the net. This is just one idea. You could also have a program that tricks them into going to entertainment events that no one else cares about like Opera, and Billy Joel concerts. Then you can charge their account 95% and they'll think they're getting a 5% discount. No one would have bought the tickets anyway so everyone wins. This has the risk of re-invigorating Billy Joel's ego, but so be it. Start importing doilies from China and watch the $$$$ roll in. When an old person wins the lotto just tell them they were reading the ticket incorrectly........$100 million in savings right there. You can't save much on energy since they all have their thermostats set at 52, but if you start selling thermostats where setting it at 52 results in 46, then you can save. There are many ways to save as you can clearly see, but I don't think the government cares about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 Another thing you can do is charge old peoples accounts for those TV antennas instead of giving them away for free. Old biddies will pay anything to not miss "Days of Our Lives". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Felt like that was aimed at you did you? You have the best anti-John Adams rant ever. Not a soul here will ever sniff the genius of that one post. Sadly, I think the historical archives have lost it, but I still have it in an email I sent to a friend. Would it help if I said I am sorry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Would it help if I said I am sorry? I'd rather you told him to go to the Y and suck yet another rooster. It's always amusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 16, 2008 Share Posted May 16, 2008 Would it help if I said I am sorry? Haha--you know we're cool now. I'm sure we might find a similar tirade I wrote if we looked hard enough, but really, I concede that yours was better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Have we won the "War on Poverty" yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Have we won the "War on Poverty" yet? Once we win the War on Drugs, we'll get to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 You could have the Social Services Administration save money by paying for peoples funeral expenses on a decreasing percentage basis. The longer they live, the less % the government pays. I have as much or more respect than anyone for old people but let's face it, they will do anything for a bargain. This idea will dramatically decrease the number of people in the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted May 19, 2008 Author Share Posted May 19, 2008 You could have the Social Services Administration save money by paying for peoples funeral expenses on a decreasing percentage basis. The longer they live, the less % the government pays. I have as much or more respect than anyone for old people but let's face it, they will do anything for a bargain. This idea will dramatically decrease the number of people in the system. The current SSA maximum expense payment for funeral costs is $255. Please quote your proposed decreasing schedule, as well as your thoughts about rebating all SS payments extracted from an individual, to the estate of that person who died before they were able to collect...my raw umber friend. After all - they did not survive to collect - doesn't your sense of justice and fair play apply here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts