Trader Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 If Chris Pollack is there I take him at three. With Harvey he is your red zone - go to specialist. A center might be more helpful than another Tight end at three. If Pollack is gone than you take the next available TE at 3.
DrDawkinstein Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 If Chris Pollack is there I take him at three. With Harvey Hardy he is your red zone - go to specialist. A center might be more helpful than another Tight end at three. If Pollack is gone than you take the next available TE at 3. ill take a Center. the TEs i wanted are already gone
Brandon Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 I go with the TE. I don't think any of the centers will be a major upgrade over Fowler and I'm not sure any are better than 4th round prospects. On the other hand, I do believe some of these TEs can be a major help this year.
Horus Posted April 27, 2008 Posted April 27, 2008 Take TE all the way..in fact I'm hopeing some Te's are still there in round 3....Carlson,Davis and Keller are already gone...to long has Buffalo overlooked the TE spot...havent had a good TE since Kieth McKeller...meanwhile we watch teams like Dallas(Whitten), NE (Watson), NYG (Shokey), Washington (Cooley) all have success with TE's...Bills desperately need TE
ExWNYer Posted April 27, 2008 Posted April 27, 2008 Martellus Bennett, TE - Texas A&M (6' 6", 250, 4.75).
ax4782 Posted April 27, 2008 Posted April 27, 2008 If Chris Pollack is there I take him at three. With Harvey he is your red zone - go to specialist. A center might be more helpful than another Tight end at three. If Pollack is gone than you take the next available TE at 3. I assume you mean Mike Pollack? And yes, if he is there, Buffalo should take him. You can get Kellen Davis in R4 and that should give us our top four needs out of the way, freeing us up for depth positions later in the draft.
Pete Posted April 27, 2008 Posted April 27, 2008 If Chris Pollack is there I take him at three. With Harvey he is your red zone - go to specialist. A center might be more helpful than another Tight end at three. If Pollack is gone than you take the next available TE at 3. Mike Pollack?
Trader Posted April 27, 2008 Author Posted April 27, 2008 Sorry yes I did mean Mike Pollack. Also the draft tek simulation which updates after every round is showing Bennett and Pollack right there available at round 3 at the Bills Pick I hope they are right
Trader Posted April 27, 2008 Author Posted April 27, 2008 Sorry yes I did mean Mike Pollack. Also the draft tek simulation which updates after every round is showing Bennett and Pollack right there available at round 3 at the Bills Pick I hope they are right I guess Draft Tek is not as smart as they think!
Trader Posted April 27, 2008 Author Posted April 27, 2008 I guess Draft Tek is not as smart as they think! Suprise one of this draft is the fact that no WR went in round 1. Surprise 2 of this draft is that Offensive linemen are leaping off the board.
USMCBillsFan Posted April 27, 2008 Posted April 27, 2008 Martellus Bennett, TE - Texas A&M (6' 6", 250, 4.75). Gone to the Cowboys at 61
Lurker Posted April 27, 2008 Posted April 27, 2008 I'd go with center. The o-line depth is pretty scarry (Duke Preston anyone?). The TE depth is thin, but if we lose a lineman, there goes the running game. Two guys I like: Kory Lichtensteiger OG/C Mike McGlynn OG/C
Recommended Posts