slyng1 Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Ten will most likely go WR no? (looks like steelers are going Mendenhall?)
John from Riverside Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Ok from this point on will anybody be upset if we trade up for a wideout?
Brandon Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 For everybody who said we should take a WR with the 11th I would just like to go on record as saying you are idiots. I guess that depends. If Devin Thomas, Limas Sweed or one of the other guys turns out to be an All Pro, that might be in question.
Pete Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Ok from this point on will anybody be upset if we trade up for a wideout? yes, we need all the picks we can have. We will draft a quality WR at 41 with comprable talent to any drafted in the first round
Pete Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 For everybody who said we should take a WR with the 11th I would just like to go on record as saying you are idiots. Is that your tea leaves or crystal ball telling you that? Perhaps Miss Cleo?
kendrickoffice Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Ok from this point on will anybody be upset if we trade up for a wideout? Kind of. the way they're dropping Id love to stay where we are and just see what we can get. Unless it's hardy, I love Hardy.
lets_go_bills Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Wow. Mendehall. Great value. Makes sense, Pitt is a running team. Parker AND Mendenhall, scary.
kendrickoffice Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Do you think the Titans if they select a wide out will take Thomas or VY's college teammate Limas Sweed?
Brandon Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Ten will most likely go WR no? (looks like steelers are going Mendenhall?) You'd think so, but who knows at this point. You'd think someone would be willing to take a risk on a tall, fast, athletic WR. Either the busts of recent years have scared teams off, or there's a feeling that these guys aren't just unworthy of a first, they're just not any good, period.
iccrewman112 Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 TENN has to go WR right? They have no one and lost Givens. Bobby Wade isn't probowler IMO
Pete Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Wow. Mendehall. Great value. Makes sense, Pitt is a running team. Parker AND Mendenhall, scary. call the cops- that was larceny!
bunnjam1 Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Wideout has to come off the board here. I say sweed
otisly00 Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 yes, we need all the picks we can have. We will draft a quality WR at 41 with comprable talent to any drafted in the first round if we can get away with our 2nd and 4th to get in the bottom of 1st, i'd do it and get sweed (if TN doesnt take him)....there will be a run on WR soon...and we could be left in dark.
In space no one can hear Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have freakin Willie Parker on my fantasy team, I could have traded his lame @SS!!!!!!!!!!!
slyng1 Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 You'd think so, but who knows at this point. You'd think someone would be willing to take a risk on a tall, fast, athletic WR. Either the busts of recent years have scared teams off, or there's a feeling that these guys aren't just unworthy of a first, they're just not any good, period. I've seen them taking Limas Sweed to "reunite" him with Vince Young... Let's hope they do that and we can trade back in for Thomas or Hardy...
sven233 Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 Yeah....Tenn is probably the best possibility since Washington traded out of their spot to select a WR.
Recommended Posts