Beerball Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Choose wisely I cannot choose more than one entry. What kind of poll is this?
erynthered Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 I cannot choose more than one entry. What kind of poll is this?
Grouse89 Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Since when did Owen Schmitt become a position???
erynthered Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 LOOK AT ME!!! I'M A !@#$ING IDIOT!!!!! Cant argue with you there.
ax4782 Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Glad to see the majority of poll takers in this one are exhibiting some sense. We need a WR in the worst way.
ieatcrayonz Posted April 25, 2008 Author Posted April 25, 2008 Glad to see the majority of poll takers in this one are exhibiting some sense. We need a WR in the worst way. They proved my experiment right. Whichever position I put on the top would have received the most votes. TE didn't get any votes, but if I put it on top, it would have had 15 or more. The DL, OL, Owen Schmitt, and LB positions received similar treatment.
keepthefaith Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Now I'm confused. I thought your irrational hate was for Losman, not Edwards. Anyway, it's just a poll, don't sweat it as if you were a hog. Is it possible that they both suck?
erynthered Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 They proved my experiment right. Whichever position I put on the top would have received the most votes. TE didn't get any votes, but if I put it on top, it would have had 15 or more. The DL, OL, Owen Schmitt, and LB positions received similar treatment. You owe me........
***PetrinoInAlbany*** Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 They proved my experiment right. Whichever position I put on the top would have received the most votes. TE didn't get any votes, but if I put it on top, it would have had 15 or more. The DL, OL, Owen Schmitt, and LB positions received similar treatment. I was surprised TE didn't dominate. Seriously, is anyone out there HAPPY with our current TE situation?????
Philly McButterpants Posted April 26, 2008 Posted April 26, 2008 I chose WR, but I'm still not convinced that the 1st Rd pick will be a receiver. I just don't see another 1st pick in the draft devoted to that position. If the draft is indeed that deep at WR, I'm hoping that the Bills go DE with the 1st pick. There is a strong liklihood that Hardy, Doucet and maybe another of the coveted receivers will still be there @ 41. They don't need a number 1 receiver. They need a big guy to complement the #1 receiver they already have. I just don't see the Bills braintrust investing that much of the cap on one position. (Unless the plan is to let Evans walk after next year and plug in someone else - Reed - as the #2)
ieatcrayonz Posted April 29, 2008 Author Posted April 29, 2008 Well, we drafted a CB, WR, DE, LB, and TE. You may not have liked all of them, but we did the job. Plus, we picked up that Army guy as a UDFA to play Owen Schmitt so we are set there too.
Recommended Posts