Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Urlacher

 

Urlacher, who is seeking a multi-year contract extension that would pad the nine-year, $57-million contract he signed in 2003, has not attended the Bears' on-going voluntary workouts and said he is unsure if he will attend the team's mandatory minicamp May 30-June 1 if a contract agreement is not reached. He also cited the opportunity to spend more time with his children as a reason for staying in Arizona.

Posted

And what is is we do with eather Mitchell or CRowell

 

 

PEOPLE OUR LINEBACKER CORE IS FINE WE NEED SECOND TIER BACKUP GUYS THAT DONT COST ALOT.

Posted
  inkman said:
Next topic please.

 

Totally agree.....lets get serious here.....and if we are going to pay a 30 year old Pro Bowl talent maga bucks from outside the organization...it better be at CB/WR or TE right now

Posted
  ch19079 said:
It wont happen. Not after we just signed a nice OLB in FA.

 

Though, Urlacher definatly deserves a long extention.

Why does he deserve an extension? He signed a 9 year deal and has 4 left.

Posted
  nucci said:
Why does he deserve an extension? He signed a 9 year deal and has 4 left.

this is why i don't understand why players always try to get long contracts. If I were a player I would prefer short contracts that allow you to negotiate every few years without looking like the bad guy. Especially in the current sports market where the next guy to sign always gets more than the last, it really makes no sense from a players stand point to want such long deals yet it seems that they always ask for more years than less. If you aren't going to respect the contract by the middle of the deal you might as well have signed for less years, giving the flexibility to negotiate another contract before your career is over.

Posted
  INeed2BeRight said:
Ok Mr. Know It All. Thanks for providing nothing to this thread.

Do you honestly think The Bears would trade their face of the franchise and arguably the best LB in the game?

×
×
  • Create New...