BUFFALOTONE Posted April 15, 2008 Posted April 15, 2008 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3347716 The Pats have the weekest strength of schedule in the league!! How is that possible? This is a team that almost cheated its way into the record books and the NFL gives them the easiest schedule in the league. You gotta be fuggin kidding me. My question is: who do they have video tape of? God I hate the Pats!
eball Posted April 15, 2008 Posted April 15, 2008 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3347716 The Pats have the weekest strength of schedule in the league!! How is that possible? This is a team that almost cheated its way into the record books and the NFL gives them the easiest schedule in the league. You gotta be fuggin kidding me. My question is: who do they have video tape of? God I hate the Pats! Do a little bit of reading before showing your ignorance. The schedule is locked years in advance, with the exception of two conference games against teams that finished in the same position the prior year. The Pats* schedule is "easiest" on paper because they get the Bills, Jets, and Fish twice, and the NFC West. The Bills schedule is 6th "easiest" because they get the Jets and Fish twice, and the NFC West.
IndyJay1234 Posted April 15, 2008 Posted April 15, 2008 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3347716 The Pats have the weekest strength of schedule in the league!! How is that possible? This is a team that almost cheated its way into the record books and the NFL gives them the easiest schedule in the league. You gotta be fuggin kidding me. My question is: who do they have video tape of? God I hate the Pats! Miami twice, Jets twice..... They play in the weakest division in football. NFC West- Same as us. AFC West- Same as us. Only reason we dont have a easier schedule is we face the 16-0 Pats twice. The Pats dont have themelves on the schedule or we would have an easier schedule than them.
IndyJay1234 Posted April 15, 2008 Posted April 15, 2008 Do a little bit of reading before showing your ignorance. The schedule is locked years in advance, with the exception of two conference games against teams that finished in the same position the prior year. The Pats* schedule is "easiest" on paper because they get the Bills, Jets, and Fish twice, and the NFC West. The Bills schedule is 6th "easiest" because they get the Jets and Fish twice, and the NFC West. Darn it Eball. You beat me..
DrDawkinstein Posted April 15, 2008 Posted April 15, 2008 people still dont understand that the schedule is already planned, as far as opponents? all the league has to do every year is work out the WHENs, the WHO is already known years in advance.
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 Do a little bit of reading before showing your ignorance. The schedule is locked years in advance, with the exception of two conference games against teams that finished in the same position the prior year. The Pats* schedule is "easiest" on paper because they get the Bills, Jets, and Fish twice, and the NFC West. The Bills schedule is 6th "easiest" because they get the Jets and Fish twice, and the NFC West. Hey typing tough guy I may be ignorant but your classeless. You could have just said the 2nd to last sentence and been done with it. Instead you chose to be an a--hole. Funny thing is you would never have the balls to say that to me in person.
VABills Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 Hey typing tough guy I may be ignorant but your classeless. You could have just said the 2nd to last sentence and been done with it. Instead you chose to be an a--hole. Funny thing is you would never have the balls to say that to me in person. And if you'd done a simple search on easiest this has already been discussed several times already in the last 24 hours.
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 And if you'd done a simple search on easiest this has already been discussed several times already in the last 24 hours. The schedule came out an hour before I started this thread. What ever, dude doesnt have to be a d--k about it.
KRC Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 The schedule came out an hour before I started this thread. What ever, dude doesnt have to be a d--k about it. Dude...You were lazy and got called out on it. Stop being such a wuss and suck it up...and yes, I would say that to your face.
lets_go_bills Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 Not to make excuses because I hate the Pats so much too. But their schedule seems easy because: a) their divisional opponents didn't do so well last year, especially Miami and New York B. b) the NFC opponent rotation happens to be the NFC West this year, which is a very weak division. But don't worry, I have a theory that the NFL will work to undermine the Pats by having the refs favour their opponents. Ha!
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 Dude...You were lazy and got called out on it. Stop being such a wuss and suck it up...and yes, I would say that to your face. I am lazy for posting a thread, ok tough guy. Im well over it. Maybe we will have the pleasure of meeting one day.
KRC Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 I am lazy for posting a thread, ok tough guy. Im well over it. Maybe we will have the pleasure of meeting one day. Ooooo...internet tough guy.
Lurker Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 The schedule came out an hour before I started this thread. What ever, dude doesnt have to be a d--k about it. The opponents were known months ago, however, which is the point that was being made. Face it: not being a dick on an Intrenet MB is a pretty rare. On TSW, it's....
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 Ooooo...internet tough guy. Look your the one who stepped in and said you would "say it in my face" I wasnt talking to you but you seem to like the attention. What do you want me to say?
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 The opponents were known months ago, however, which is the point that was being made. Face it: not being a dick on an Intrenet MB is a pretty rare. On TSW, it's.... I see what your saying I didnt want this to be a s--t storm. I m guilty of sarcasm as well but i dont call people names.
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 How about nothing. Novel idea for a message board.
taterhill Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 Look your the one who stepped in and said you would "say it in my face" I wasnt talking to you but you seem to like the attention. What do you want me to say? easy big guy...also you shouldnt post your pic on the net....nice shirt
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 16, 2008 Author Posted April 16, 2008 easy big guy...also you shouldnt post your pic on the net....nice shirt How did you find that??
Recommended Posts