DreamOnDan Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 I've been one of the people that really want a wr in rd 1. I definately see the value in getting your guy when it comes down to choosing a 6-2 to 6-6 tall wr that most likely won't be there in rd 2. I like the idea of drafting another position in rd 1 after seeing how good the te prospects look. My original theory was that there wasn't going to be a te good enough to make an impact after rd 2. So I thought that rd2 was almost a must for a TE since the Bills would be very likely to have a choice from 2 out of the top 3 te in rd 2. Most likely there are 3-4 te drafted by our 3rd rd pick and you can bet that somebody good slips to rd 3. Since the Te class seems so deep I now think that it might be a really good thing if we draft best player available in rd 1, 4,5,6,7. The problem is that it really puts a lot of pressure on getting production out of whoever slips to rd 2. Realistically 1-3 out of, Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly, Mario Manningham, Early Doucet, and Andre Caldwell could very well slip to the 2nd rd. Especially if the Bills don't draft a wr in rd 1. I'm very happy with any of the above players. As long as the Bills definately draft the best Te on the board in rd 3. The entire rest of the draft could be best player available. Lets take a look at NFL.com te prospects: http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/john-carlson?id=1966 http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/martellus-bennett?id=1062 http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/fred-davis?id=216 http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/dustin-keller?id=1074 http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/martin-rucker?id=308 http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/jermichael-finley?id=1072 http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/jacob-tamme?id=324 http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/kellen-davis?id=1066 I'd be all about drafting 2 te or 2 wr this year!
Recommended Posts