RayFinkle Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 If you can't figure out how to take and score the test, you are a moron. Be honest, if you want to lie to make yourself seem like a big man, you beat the system. Congrats stud. I scored a 39.
JM57 Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 If you can't figure out how to take and score the test, you are a moron. Be honest, if you want to lie to make yourself seem like a big man, you beat the system. Congrats stud. I scored a 39. Got 8/9, which translates to 44/50. I got the duplicates question wrong.
KD in CA Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 Got 8/9, which translates to 44/50. I got the duplicates question wrong. lol....same here. Didn't have the patience for that one.... Those are the exact same questions you see every time someone posts a sample Wonderlick. Don't they ever change the questions?
HereComesTheReignAgain Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 44 (8/9 correct). I missed the duplicates question too.
Dan Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 39. But, in my defense I got a phone call part way through that cost me 1 question.
RayFinkle Posted March 26, 2008 Author Posted March 26, 2008 If you scored 9 out of 9, and couldn't figure out what your probable wonderlic score is....ummmm yeah.
Chilly Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 If you scored 9 out of 9, and couldn't figure out what your probable wonderlic score is....ummmm yeah. Ah, but the question is raised, is a 9 question cross-section of the test an accurate enough representation to extrapolate a reasonable probable score?
Cornerville Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 I got a 2. Al Davis is now interested in signing me to a $50 million dollar deal
The Dean Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 Ah, but the question is raised, is a 9 question cross-section of the test an accurate enough representation to extrapolate a reasonable probable score? A 9 question cross-section, picked by who, and for what purpose? The same 9 question cross-section that has been used for years, BTW. My guess is it is a lousy representation of the total test. (That is, "good" as an example of the test, but "poor" as a predictor of the results.)
RayFinkle Posted March 26, 2008 Author Posted March 26, 2008 Ah, but the question is raised, is a 9 question cross-section of the test an accurate enough representation to extrapolate a reasonable probable score? Me thinks they may have rigged the test to make us, the sports fans, feel like mensa members. If that is an honest assessment of the wonderlic, then there are some gentlemen in the NFL who border on mental retardation.
CJPearl2 Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 How could any of you not get 9 out of 9? That test was a joke.
Lv-Bills Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 Ummmm, 9 of 9. LOL Wow, how fuggin dumb is Vince Young? And what does this say about the U of Texas. Hey, I'm just sayin.
Recommended Posts