Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

interesting. looks like they don't want to have to rely on rookie depth at corner if they don't have to. Probably a good plan considering how young our secondary is. He's appeared in every game the last 3 years which is impressive and means he stays healthy. Last year he was most productive. Looks like a pure depth guy at this point though.

Posted
interesting. looks like they don't want to have to rely on rookie depth at corner if they don't have to. Probably a good plan considering how young our secondary is. He's appeared in every game the last 3 years which is impressive and means he stays healthy. Last year he was most productive. Looks like a pure depth guy at this point though.

 

 

So what you are saying is.......

 

 

 

 

 

CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

:thumbsup:

Posted

Recent Career Tackles Sacks Interceptions Misc

Year Team G Solo Ast Total Sack YdsL Int Yds IntTD DefTD FFum PD Sfty

2005 Oakland 16 7 2 9 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

2006 Oakland 16 12 6 18 0.0 0 1 100 1 1 0 2 0

2007 Oakland 16 24 4 28 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Totals (Full) 48 43 12 55 0.0 0 1 100 1 1 0 5 0

 

 

 

I know you can't read it but he had a 100 yard TD interception! NICE! Seems like a good guy to have on the team. Competition is ALWAYS good.

Posted
Recent Career Tackles Sacks Interceptions Misc

Year Team G Solo Ast Total Sack YdsL Int Yds IntTD DefTD FFum PD Sfty

2005 Oakland 16 7 2 9 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

2006 Oakland 16 12 6 18 0.0 0 1 100 1 1 0 2 0

2007 Oakland 16 24 4 28 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Totals (Full) 48 43 12 55 0.0 0 1 100 1 1 0 5 0

I know you can't read it but he had a 100 yard TD interception! NICE! Seems like a good guy to have on the team. Competition is ALWAYS good.

 

Isn't this the guy that has a TON of speed that also is in their return game? If so, I say Yes! I am surprised actually the Raiders have not resigned him but I guess their money is going everywhere (and I mean, EVERYwhere) else...this guy is not a great corner, but he would be decent depth and could spell McGee in returns which might help McGee's effectiveness on D also.

Posted

Jim Leonhard replacement maybe? Did we tender him or not? I don't remember, but he doesn't appear on the Bills depth chart.

 

played FS at Boise State. His timed speed was pedestrian 4.62 in the 40, but that's not really what counts anymore since he has demonstrated his speed at the pro-level.

Posted

Ton of speed. Pretty damn good return man. Not had much chance at corner but he doesn't seem to have much interest in him. He would be our #5, but probably better than Dustin Fox.

 

I feel strong both ways about this, because I think McGee is a fabulous KR, but we may want to start giving him some time off. Chris Carr is good at that.

Posted
since he is considered restricted, what would we have to give up?

 

Nothing. He is a low tender RFA. No draft picks would have to be given up.

Posted
since he is considered restricted, what would we have to give up?

 

 

he's free - he was undrafted.

Carr is a non-compensation restricted free agent, so any team that signs him will not owe the Raiders a draft pick. (Yahoo! Sports)

×
×
  • Create New...