\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Colle...yBetterSex.aspx
The Dean Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 "...wealth is an aphrodisiac, especially for women..." There's a real news flash.
Lurker Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 "...wealth is an aphrodisiac, especially for women..." There's a real news flash. Yeah...'put a bag over her head' chicks can still get some loving if they got the green.
Cugalabanza Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 As a person of moderate income, I find this insulting and discriminatory. Besides, all this sex-in-a-private-jet stuff is overrated. You can get a perfectly good handjob for $5 down at the bus station.
KD in CA Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 Some 84% of rich women and 63% of rich men say having money means having better sex. Probably because the rich women are all banging their personal trainer or tennis pro and the hubby is knocking down 22 year old call girls named 'Kristen'
EndZoneCrew Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 Probably because the rich women are all banging their personal trainer or tennis pro and the hubby is knocking down 22 year old call girls named 'Kristen' So true....I was going to post the same exact thing until I saw your post...touche!
Cugalabanza Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 Probably because the rich women are all banging their personal trainer or tennis pro and the hubby is knocking down 22 year old call girls named 'Kristen' Yeah, it's funny that all these rich people are having tons of great sex, but not with each other.
Guffalo Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 Yeah, it's funny that all these rich people are having tons of great sex, but not with each other. I assume thats why it is called "trickle down economics"
apuszczalowski Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 If this is true, how come you always see ghettos's and trailer parks filled with tons of kids, and mansions with no kids?
Guffalo Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 If this is true, how come you always see ghettos's and trailer parks filled with tons of kids, and mansions with no kids? Ahem, I guess you missed the veiled reference to the Lewinsky blue dress, which was fully involved in the "trickle down" effects in play here.
the_franchise Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 If this is true, how come you always see ghettos's and trailer parks filled with tons of kids, and mansions with no kids? Because they can afford birth control and condoms
Just Jack Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 If this is true, how come you always see ghettos's and trailer parks filled with tons of kids, and mansions with no kids? Here's why.
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 Here's why. Love the "case study!" Clevon: "Sh*t! I got too many damn kids... I thought you were on the pill or some sh*t!" "Heeeeeell no!"
Recommended Posts