Kelly the Dog Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Hey buttmonkey, it was CNN who do you think they e-mailed. Look, I don't have to argue with someone as scewed as you. The fact is, people saw the debate. If they think that it was anythig less then a tie (and that is being generous to kerry) then they are just being dishonest. 69488[/snapback] RICH! RICH! RICH! PLEASE, PLEASE READ. The post directly above has a quote directly from the people who conducted the TELEPHONE POLL. Saying IT WAS A TELEPHONE POLL. Here is it again. Please return from neverneverbetterland and read the paragraph below. Survey Methods All results are based on telephone interviews with 511 registered voters, aged 18 and older, who watched the presidential debate Oct. 13, 2004. Respondents were first interviewed Oct. 11-12, 2004, when they indicated there was some chance they would watch tonight's debate and were willing to be called back. For results based on the total sample of debate watchers, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points. The link is above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich in Ohio Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 RICH! RICH! RICH! PLEASE, PLEASE READ. The post directly above has a quote directly from the people who conducted the TELEPHONE POLL. Saying IT WAS A TELEPHONE POLL. Here is it again. Please return from neverneverbetterland and read the paragraph below. The link is above. 69515[/snapback] You miss the point. CNN has only one persentage point more credibility then CBS. Regardless of how the poll was conducted, it is meaningless, unless of course you are a liberal acky, who expects this kind of reporting. have a nice day in your tiny world. by the way, don't miss al frankens show today, I have no doubt that thye will have kerry winning by a 5 - 1 margin. That should make you feel just super. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 CNN has only one persentage point more credibility then CBS. Regardless of how the poll was conducted, it is meaningless, unless of course you are a liberal acky, who expects this kind of reporting. 69531[/snapback] I nominate the above for "Dumbass Obnoxious Clueless Post of the Week". Second, anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 You miss the point. CNN has only one persentage point more credibility then CBS. Regardless of how the poll was conducted, it is meaningless, unless of course you are a liberal acky, who expects this kind of reporting. have a nice day in your tiny world. by the way, don't miss al frankens show today, I have no doubt that thye will have kerry winning by a 5 - 1 margin. That should make you feel just super. 69531[/snapback] No, the point is you said it was an internet poll, and attacked someone for saying it wasn't, and then were proved dead friggin' wrong, as usual. No wonder you love George W. Bush. Even in the face of indisputable evidence that you were wrong right in front of you, for all the world to see, you still simply refuse to acknowledge it. BTW, CNN didn't conduct the poll, Gallup did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 I nominate the above for "Dumbass Obnoxious Clueless Post of the Week". Second, anyone? 69535[/snapback] God there are so many from this one source alone, how could you prioritize them. That was kind of a beaut, though, you're right, considering the context and the previous responses in this thread. One would think, the smart conservatives, and there are many here, would step in and put an end to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 God there are so many from this one source alone, how could you prioritize them. That was kind of a beaut, though, you're right, considering the context and the previous responses in this thread. One would think, the smart conservatives, and there are many here, would step in and put an end to him. 69540[/snapback] Tough choice...but really, it came down to "persentage". Of course, what do we know about the proper spelling of the word? None of us can compete with him intellectually. And why put an end to him? Don't you get the same guilty pleasure from watching the RiO/Boomer vs. tenny/blzrul cage matches that you do from lingering on the occasional WWF match for five minutes while flipping channels? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Tough choice...but really, it came down to "persentage". Of course, what do we know about the proper spelling of the word? None of us can compete with him intellectually. And why put an end to him? Don't you get the same guilty pleasure from watching the RiO/Boomer vs. tenny/blzrul cage matches that you do from lingering on the occasional WWF match for five minutes while flipping channels? 69555[/snapback] Did you ever notice that the majority of "richios" have the letter that sounds like the correct letter? These aren't typos. Typos are when you mistype, and the wrong letter is HIGHLY likely to be one or two letters away from the correct letter on the computer keyboard. "Richios" have letters at times on the complete opposite side of the keyboard. "Persentages" is kind of a bad example, because the "s" and the "c" are within two keystrokes of one another. Although they fall into the same category as a "richio" because really, what are the chances that he actually accidentally hit the "s" when he was trying to hit the "c"? What a coinsidents, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidey Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 I nominate the above for "Dumbass Obnoxious Clueless Post of the Week". Second, anyone? 69535[/snapback] Second and third if required Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidey Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Did you ever notice that the majority of "richios" have the letter that sounds like the correct letter? These aren't typos. Typos are when you mistype, and the wrong letter is HIGHLY likely to be one or two letters away from the correct letter on the computer keyboard. "Richios" have letters at times on the complete opposite side of the keyboard. "Persentages" is kind of a bad example, because the "s" and the "c" are within two keystrokes of one another. Although they fall into the same category as a "richio" because really, what are the chances that he actually accidentally hit the "s" when he was trying to hit the "c"? What a coinsidents, huh? 69562[/snapback] Fat Fungers, oops Fingwrs, oops Fingerx, oops Fingers. Damn maybe its just sticky keys on the keyboard from something I wish not to really know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jock Sniffer Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Regardless of how the poll was conducted it was clear Kerry is the stronger debater. He made up a huge amount of ground on GW. All this means is strap yourself in for 3 weeks of GOP smear & scare tactics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Typical responses from the pro-Bush side. If you don't like the facts just criticize the messenger, the source, the weather, say it's a liberal conspiracy or change the subject completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 You miss the point. CNN has only one persentage point more credibility then CBS. Yes, we all know the only media source that matters is Fox News. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted October 14, 2004 Author Share Posted October 14, 2004 Did you ever notice that the majority of "richios" have the letter that sounds like the correct letter? These aren't typos. Typos are when you mistype, and the wrong letter is HIGHLY likely to be one or two letters away from the correct letter on the computer keyboard. "Richios" have letters at times on the complete opposite side of the keyboard. "Persentages" is kind of a bad example, because the "s" and the "c" are within two keystrokes of one another. Although they fall into the same category as a "richio" because really, what are the chances that he actually accidentally hit the "s" when he was trying to hit the "c"? What a coinsidents, huh? 69562[/snapback] Boy I am sorry I was in court all day today and missed this. "coinsidents" Now that was funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts