coachhillenbrand Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm thinking Preston and then Pennington beating out Langston Walker.
The Dean Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 Sounds like they are crunching some numbers together for a possible deal with Tennessee. As much as I would love Turner on our team, I wouldn't do so by giving up our first round pick this year. A third this year and a second next year would do it for me or I might even look at a third this year and "possibly" a first next year. Turner is the real deal (in my opinion) but I would hate to make this move and then lose out on a chance to draft an Okoye, Willis, or Peterson. I don't think Okoye or Peterson will last to 12 anyway but if they did and we had given up our #1 pick this year...............................UGGGGGGGGGGGG I have to believe one of those three might be available at #12. Not to be one of "those guys", but there are several threads discussing this, all on the front page (at least my front page of the board. You might want to just take a quick peek at the Wall, before slapping down a new thread. Just, IMAO. EDIT, I'm leaving my post above "as is", just as a reference for later use. Thanks, to Matty T for the idea to amend this, in response to the original poster's bait-and-switch on the subject and 1st post of the thread.
marauderswr80 Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 You cant give a first round pick for a backup RB....PERIOD! As much as I like Turner, giving a first rounder IMHO is way too risky for a backup RB.
RuntheDamnBall Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 You cant give a first round pick for a backup RB....PERIOD! As much as I like Turner, giving a first rounder IMHO is way too risky for a backup RB.
ROCCEO Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm thinking Preston and then Pennington beating out Langston Walker. Im thinking Preston sucks and the only way he starts is if langston is RT and Whittle blows goats. BTW The responses dontmatch teh thread title. What is going on?
MDH Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 The original thread starter changed the title and the content of his post.
Sketch Soland Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm thinking Preston and then Pennington beating out Langston Walker. So you think we paid Walker 25 mil to sit on the bench? There is no way he won't start and most likely RT.
The Dean Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm thinking Preston and then Pennington beating out Langston Walker. I'm freakin speechless (yet I continue...how odd). You changed the subject of the thread, AND your intro post, after there had already been several replies? I LOVE (or hate) that. Think of the fun to be had...
Matt in KC Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm freakin speechless (yet I continue...how odd). You changed the subject of the thread, AND your intro post, after there had already been several replies? I LOVE (or hate) that. Think of the fun to be had... This IS fun. I had to hit "Refresh" to see if you had changed your post yet....
OnTheRocks Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm freakin speechless (yet I continue...how odd). You changed the subject of the thread, AND your intro post, after there had already been several replies? I LOVE (or hate) that. Think of the fun to be had... i hate it.
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm thinking Preston and then Pennington beating out Langston Walker. Unless something crazy happens in training camp, Pennington will not beatout Walker. Remember, until Oakland move Walker from tackle to guard he was a pretty good player.
LabattBlue Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I'm thinking Preston and then Pennington beating out Langston Walker. If this ends up being true, the Bills just pissed away a huge amount of money on Walker. You don't pay a guy that kind of money to be a backup now matter how poorly he plays in training camp.
coachhillenbrand Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 I tried to delete the original post not realizing there were so many other similar threads out there and all I could find was the "edit" or "reply" comment. So I changed the subject, started a new thread, and was hoping you would delete your original response. Obviously that didn't happen so while you keep dwelling on the original post and continuing to cry about things, other people are moving on and only responding to the new subject. Get over it! I'm freakin speechless (yet I continue...how odd). You changed the subject of the thread, AND your intro post, after there had already been several replies? I LOVE (or hate) that. Think of the fun to be had...
ans4e64 Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I agree with the other posters. I could care less if he lines up at RG or RT, but he's going to be one of the starting five with that kind of salary. Oh and even without the salary, Preston isn't beating out Walker's grandmother.
coachhillenbrand Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 Oh, you're right................the Bills way overpaid this average at best RT and gave him the position strictly because of the money they're dishing out. Nice job bonehead but things don't work that way in the NFL, nothing is given to anyone. No one is saying Pennington is definitely penciled in as our starting RT just like nobody, including from the Bills organization have confirmed that Walker is starting. Things will play out and the best player by the end of the pre-season will take it. So you think we paid Walker 25 mil to sit on the bench? There is no way he won't start and most likely RT.
Bill from NYC Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 Oh, you're right................the Bills way overpaid this average at best RT and gave him the position strictly because of the money they're dishing out.No one is saying Pennington is definitely penciled in as our starting RT just like nobody, including from the Bills organization have confirmed that Walker is starting. . No, but it is a pretty safe bet. At his "cash to cap" press conference, Marv complained about the TE having to help the OTs, and he certainly wasn't talking about Peters. Walker might be "average at best." I don't know, but it is a safe bet to assume that Marv and Co. don't think that he is for 25 million (not that 25 mil for an OT breaks the bank these days).
R. Rich Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 No, but it is a pretty safe bet. At his "cash to cap" press conference, Marv complained about the TE having to help the OTs, and he certainly wasn't talking about Peters. Walker might be "average at best." I don't know, but it is a safe bet to assume that Marv and Co. don't think that he is for 25 million (not that 25 mil for an OT breaks the bank these days). And that's the point, William: w/ the way the cap has gone up, $25 million isn't a huge salary. It's still a lot of money, but not in relation to the cap and to some of the salaries that have been given out for linemen this offseason.
RuntheDamnBall Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 If this ends up being true, the Bills just pissed away a huge amount of money on Walker. You don't pay a guy that kind of money to be a backup now matter how poorly he plays in training camp. You put the best players on the field, regardless of pay. So if Walker turns out to be a poor investment, so be it. But it's better to be sitting on a couple of good options rather than saying outright that Pennington is not going to be the guy. As was the case with JP last year, the competition will do everybody good. Pennington may have been a 7th rounder but we have seen street free agents blossom into great tackles. It's not the norm but it does happen. At the same time, the investment in Walker will no go unnoticed and if he is the man for the job he will surely earn it.
I 90 Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 Walker might be "average at best." I don't know, but it is a safe bet to assume that Marv and Co. don't think that he is for 25 million (not that 25 mil for an OT breaks the bank these days). I looked into that. At RT Pashos moved for 5 yrs. 24 million, Petitgout 3 yrs. 15 milion; Stinchcomb stayed (NOrl) for 2 yrs. 7 million --- they were considered best of breed. Interestingly, two marginal Left Tackles that moved are expected to start for around 2 million a year -- Damion McIntosh (KC) and Jordan Black (Hou)... best of luck Mr. Schaub. Walker is a significant investment. He will play right tackle whether we prefer him at guard or not.
Recommended Posts