DrDawkinstein Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Fox News' reporting... Apparently 33 and 12 are larger numbers than 40? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Fox News' reporting... Apparently 33 and 12 are larger numbers than 40? Hahaha What a d-bag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Hahaha What a d-bag. Are we laughing at the newscaster, or the guy who made the chart? My guess is that the chart maker played the April Fool's joke on the newscaster. When have you ever seen a chart that puts the #1 vote getter last like that? I think it was a ploy to make the guy look like an idiot. It worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Are we laughing at the newscaster, or the guy who made the chart? My guess is that the chart maker played the April Fool's joke on the newscaster. When have you ever seen a chart that puts the #1 vote getter last like that? I think it was a ploy to make the guy look like an idiot. It worked. well actually I meant the newscaster AND president Bush... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Fox News' reporting... Apparently 33 and 12 are larger numbers than 40? FOX News is "Fair and Balanced" (yeah, right). They don't claim to be "Accurate". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Are we laughing at the newscaster, or the guy who made the chart? My guess is that the chart maker played the April Fool's joke on the newscaster. When have you ever seen a chart that puts the #1 vote getter last like that? I think it was a ploy to make the guy look like an idiot. It worked. I think the newscaster just assumed that the first name on the list won the poll, because it sounds like as he read through the names, he realizes that GW should have been the winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob2232 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 He also said "also high on the list....micheal jackson...." Umm...Micheal Jackson WASNT ON THE LIST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Avenger Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 I think the newscaster just assumed that the first name on the list won the poll, because it sounds like as he read through the names, he realizes that GW should have been the winner. I'd agree with you on that, had it not been for the fact that he was simply reading a script on the prompter and the video package that went with the story was a clip reel on Brittney Spears with absolutely no footage of Bush. This was not a newscaster just reading the chart wrong. Given the journalistic integrity of Fox News I tend to believe they put Bush at the bottom to try and sweep under the rug that more people found him foolish than a pop star who snapped and went bald... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmet_hair Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 here we go again Bush bad, Fox evil, big oil......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ESPeculatioN Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 I love how they pause at the end. It makes you wonder what was being yelled into their ear pieces. DONT SAY THE PRESIDENT, DONT SAY BUSH GODDAMMIT!!!! The documentary Outfoxed proves not only what drueling propoganda Fox News is but the same about local Fox affiliate news casts are as well. No offense to the anchors they are only being threatened if things don't go King Murdochs way. Check it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts